Manufacturing review: a device history record review could not be performed as the lot number is unknown.Investigation summary: the device was not returned for evaluation.Medical records were provided and reviewed.Approximately two months of post deployment, a computed tomography abdomen pelvis showed extensive ilio-caval deep vein thrombosis extending from the common femoral veins through the infra renal inferior vena cava, extending above level of apex of inferior vena cava filter by approximately 1.5 cm.Five days later, the patient presented with abdominal pain and the next day, the patient developed acute low back pain.Four days later, an x-ray abdomen kub scan showed the filter at the l2-l3 level.One year and eleven months later, an x-ray abdomen kub scan showed an appropriately positioned inferior vena cava filter.One year and eleven months later, a vq scan showed the presence of a newly developed pulmonary embolism.One year and two months later, a nm ventilation perfusion scan demonstrated intermediate likelihood ratio for pulmonary embolism, mostly due to suboptimal ventilatory imaging.Therefore, the investigation is inconclusive as no objective evidence has been provided to confirm any alleged deficiency with the filter.Additionally, it can be confirmed that the patient experienced pulmonary embolism and thrombus above the filter post deployment.However, the relationship to the filter is unknown.Based on the available information, the definitive root cause is unknown.Labeling review: a review of product labeling documents (e.G.Procedural instructions, indications, warnings, precautions, cautions, possible complications, contraindications, and unit label) showed that the product labeling is adequate.
|