|
As reported, during a percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, the hydrophilic coating of a roadrunner uniglide hydrophilic wire guide separated from the device.The device required force to advance through a needle during the procedure.Post-operative x-ray revealed that coating from the device remained in the patient's gall bladder.Due to the possibility of bile leakage, a cholecystectomy was performed to remove the retained device coating and gall bladder.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional event information has been requested.
|
|
Additional information was received 21jul2021.Another manufacturer's entry needle was used for access and the complaint wire was removed through the entry needle.Latex gloves were worn, and the hydrophilic coating was activated using saline.The device, which was only used one time, was kept hydrated when not in use.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Summary of event: as reported, during a percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage, the hydrophilic coating of a roadrunner uniglide hydrophilic wire guide separated from the device.The device required force to advance through a needle during the procedure.Post-operative x-ray revealed that coating from the device remained in the patient's gall bladder.Due to the possibility of bile leakage, a cholecystectomy was performed to remove the retained device coating and gall bladder.Another manufacturer's entry needle was used for access and the complaint wire was removed through the entry needle.Latex gloves were worn, and the hydrophilic coating was activated using saline.The device, which was only used one time, was kept hydrated when not in use.The patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.Additional information: b5 investigation evaluation: reviews of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, and quality control procedures were conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned to cook for investigation.A document-based investigation evaluation was performed.No related non-conformances were found, and there have been no other reported complaints for this lot number.The complaint file, device history record, complaint history, validations, and manufacturing documents provide evidence that the device was manufactured to specification.There is no evidence of nonconforming devices from the complaint lot in house or in the field.Cook has concluded that sufficient inspection activities are in place to identify this failure mode prior to distribution.The product ifu instructs the user to avoid manipulation or withdrawal of the hydrophilic wire back through a metal needle or cannula, stating that the needle could shear the wire guide.Based on the information provided and the results of the investigation, cook has concluded that operational factors contributed to the event, as the ifu warns against manipulation or withdrawal of the wire through the needle.The risk analysis for this failure mode was reviewed and no additional escalation was required.The appropriate personnel have been notified and cook will continue to monitor for similar events.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|