|
Investigation: no sample returned.Analysis and findings: complaint (b)(4).Distribution history: the complaint product was manufactured at csi, but the lot number was not provided.So, the date of manufacture is not available and the dhr could not be reviewed.Manufacturing record review: a review of the device history record could not be performed because the lot number was not provided.However, it should be noted at the time of manufacture records from each lot are thoroughly reviewed to ensure that products are released meeting all coopersurgical quality release specifications.Should the complaint product lot number be provided going forward, the device history record will be reviewed, and this complaint amended accordingly.Incoming inspection review: incoming inspection record review not applicable to this product.Service history record : service history not applicable for this product.Historical complaint review: a review of the 2-year complaint history showed similar reported complaint conditions.Product receipt: the complaint product has not been returned to coopersurgical.Visual evaluation: evaluation of the complaint product could not be completed as the complaint product has not been returned to coopersurgical.If the product should be returned at a later date, it will be evaluated, and any findings will be appended to this investigation.Functional evaluation: evaluation of the complaint product could not be completed as the complaint product has not been returned to coopersurgical.If the product should be returned at a later date, it will be evaluated, and any findings will be appended to this investigation.Root cause : root cause not applicable as the complaint condition was not confirmed.Correction and/or corrective action: coopersurgical will continue to monitor this complaint condition for trends.No further corrective action is necessary, as the complaint condition was not confirmed.No further training required at this time.Was the complaint confirmed? no.
|