| Model Number |
275005 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/05/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A device evaluation and/or device history review is anticipated, but is not complete.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that while using bd macro-vue¿ rpr card test a physical defect was observed by the laboratory personnel.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "the particles are too thick".
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H6: investigation summary: serology test was performed and satisfactory results were obtained.Visual inspection and batch record review was performed no discrepancies were found.No photo or returned goods were available we were unable to reproduce customer experience.Complaint unconfirmed based on retention and batch record review.Although we are unable to reproduce customer claim, special attention should be provided to: antigen storage and use.Sample and room temperature during the test.Type of specimen used: collection and preparation.According of the ¿manual of test for syphilis¿ edition 9.0 the following ¿sources of error¿ had been identified for increase of reactivity or false reactivity for the rpr test.If the time of rotation is too long, test reactivity may be increased.If the card is excessively rotated and tilted (to and fro motions) by hand after removal from the rotator, a false reactive result may occur.If the serum is unevenly spread in the circle, the antigen and the antibody may not mix properly.H3 other text : see h10.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that while using bd macro-vue¿ rpr card test a physical defect was observed by the laboratory personnel.There was no indication that results were reported out and there was no report of patient impact.The following information was provided by the initial reporter: "the particles are too thick.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|