| Model Number |
7210426 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
05/05/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a cuff repair, when passing the suture of the accu-pass, it locked in the wheel.The procedure was successfully completed without a significant delay using a back-up device.No patient injury or other complications were reported.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H10.H3, h6: the reported device, used in treatment, was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of the device history records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specification or would not be able to perform as intended.A complaint history review concluded this was a repeat issue.The customer provided image confirmed the product identification information.A relationship, if any, between the subject device and the reported event could not be determined.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).H6: health code updated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).H3, h6: part of the reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection found no issues.A functional evaluation revealed the devices operated as expected.The wheels moved with ease, without friction.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.The customer provided image confirmed the product identification information.The root cause could not be determined since the reported malfunction could not be duplicated during the investigation.Factors that could have contributed to the reported event include an application of unintended inappropriate or excessive force to the device, an impact event inconsistent with normal use, wear from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling, or inadequate routine maintenance.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|