Model Number 3662 |
Device Problem
Wireless Communication Problem (3283)
|
Patient Problem
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
Event Date 05/26/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Date of event is estimated.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient's ipg has consistent communication issues while trying to connect to external devices.A manufacturer representative met with the patient and attempted to connect multiple times, but the ipg would not hold a bond for long.As a result, surgical intervention may take place at a later date to address the issue.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received stated that the patient underwent surgical intervention wherein the ipg was explanted and replaced.Post-operatively, stimulation therapy was restored and the communication issues were resolved.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A4 patient weight added to the report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported observation ¿multiple error messages during cp/pc communication¿ was confirmed and duplicated during analysis.The root cause of the observation was due to the bluetooth (ble) antenna electrical contacts not being properly seated into the hybrid plug p2 of the printed circuit board.The ipg diagnostic logs from the field showed the bluetooth ¿ble¿ function did allow a communication session on the reported observation date.The ipg logs also showed the device had been programmed and stimulation was turned off and on.The device exhibited normal functionality during analysis when the device was in close proximity to an artemis programmer.As the distance between the returned ipg and artemis programmer increased, the ability to communicate was reduced, which is consistent with the field observation.The device was subjected to a functional test on automated test equipment (ate).This tester verifies the electrical performance of the control/communication circuitry, and output signal integrity.All portions of ate testing passed with the tester bluetooth interface dongle positioned within 1ft of the returned ipg.Normal positioning of the bluetooth interface dongle is 6 ft from the ipg, but the returned ipg did not pass.Manufacturing investigation: plano site: no issue found with dhr review.There was no rework or ncmr associated with this event.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported observation ¿multiple error messages during cp/pc communication¿ was confirmed and duplicated during analysis.The root cause of the observation was due to the bluetooth (ble) antenna leads were fractured at the header/can junction.The ipg diagnostic logs from the field showed the bluetooth ¿ble¿ function did allow a communication session on the reported observation date.The ipg logs also showed the device had been programmed and stimulation was turned off and on.The device exhibited normal functionality during analysis when the device was in close proximity to an artemis programmer.As the distance between the returned ipg and artemis programmer increased, the ability to communicate was reduced, which is consistent with the field observation.The device was subjected to a functional test on automated test equipment (ate).This tester verifies the electrical performance of the control/communication circuitry, and output signal integrity.All portions of ate testing passed with the tester bluetooth interface dongle positioned within 1ft of the returned ipg.Normal positioning of the bluetooth interface dongle is 6 ft from the ipg, but the returned ipg failed at this distance.Manufacturing investigation: plano site: no issue found with dhr review.There was no rework or ncmr associated with this event.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|