• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON CR X3 TIBIAL INSERT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH TRIATHLON CR X3 TIBIAL INSERT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO Back to Search Results
Model Number 5530-G-411
Medical Device Problem Code Unstable (1667)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Joint Laxity (4526); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 05/03/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
Revision of insert due to instability.
 
Event or Problem Description
Revision of insert due to instability.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event; an event regarding instability and wear involving a triathlon insert was reported.The event of instability was not confirmed, while the event of wear was confirmed via evaluation of the returned device.Method & results: device evaluation and results: the device was returned for evaluation.Wear/damage is observed on the flange of the insert.A material analysis has been performed.The report concluded: the uhmwpe1 insert experienced an overload failure on one side of an anterior flange area after significant wear-related material removal.No material or manufacturing defects were found on the surfaces investigated.Clinician review: a review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: this inquiry reports the failure of a total knee replacement at 7 years after implantation due to instability and possibly fracture of the polyethylene.I cannot confirm that this event took place since i was not able to view the explanted parts, nor a revision operation report.Regarding the possible root cause of this event, i cannot determine it with certainty.Causes of late instability are multifactorial including patient factors such as weight and activity level, surgical technique factors such as proper ligament balancing, as well as possible trauma.Device history review: review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.  conclusion: it was reported that the patient's knee was revised due to instability.The device was returned for evaluation.Wear/damage is observed on the flange of the insert.The material analysis of the returned device concluded: the uhmwpe1 insert experienced an overload failure on one side of an anterior flange area after significant wear-related material removal.No material or manufacturing defects were found on the surfaces investigated.A review of the provided medical records by a clinical consultant indicated: this inquiry reports the failure of a total knee replacement at 7 years after implantation due to instability and possibly fracture of the polyethylene.I cannot confirm that this event took place since i was not able to view the explanted parts, nor a revision operation report.Regarding the possible root cause of this event, i cannot determine it with certainty.Causes of late instability are multifactorial including patient factors such as weight and activity level, surgical technique factors such as proper ligament balancing, as well as possible trauma.The exact cause of the event could not be determined.Further information such as revision operative reports are required to confirm the instability and determine a route cause.No further investigation for this event is possible at this time.If additional information become available to indicate further evaluation is warranted, this record will be reopened.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRIATHLON CR X3 TIBIAL INSERT
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, CO
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
marisol santiago
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key12002707
Report Number0002249697-2021-01036
Device Sequence Number3589033
Product Code MBH
UDI-Device Identifier07613327050486
UDI-Public07613327050486
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountrySW
PMA/510(K) Number
K141056
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2014
Device Explanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Health Professional
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/23/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2019
Device Model Number5530-G-411
Device Catalogue Number5530-G-411
Device Lot NumberMNA2KJ
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 05/21/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer06/01/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/15/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date06/23/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/23/2014
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age86 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight73 KG
-
-