• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP. URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE Back to Search Results
Model Number URF-V2
Device Problems Break (1069); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 05/22/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device was not returned to omsc for evaluation but was returned to olympus (b)(4) olympus (b)(4) confirmed that the subject device was cut at the insertion section and the bending section was in bending state.The exact cause of the reported event could not be conclusively determined at this time.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented.
 
Event Description
Olympus medical systems corp.(omsc) was informed from the user that during the ureteroscopic lithotomy with the subject device, subject device could not be withdraw and the up/down angulation control lever was stuck.The user performed x-ray inspection and found that the distal end and the bending section of the subject device were in bending state.The sheath of the flexible ureteroscope can withdraw normally when it is tilted, but it cannot withdraw when it is stuck.The user still could not withdraw the subject after the user cut the insertion section of the subject device.The user withdrew the subject device by the laparotomy.The user facility did not provide other detailed information.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The subject device was returned to omsc for evaluation.Omsc found the following with the returned device: appearance check: - the user cut the subject device at the base of insertion section.Ns unit was separated from the device.- bending section slightly curved.Omsc applied external stress there by finger, which made the bending section straighten easily.- a-rubber was leaking at 2 points.Omsc identified a liner scratch such as connecting two leaking points on the up side, which is sign of contact with hard material such as calculus.Result of ct scan: - cable support was broken and fell into the bending tube where the bending section is slightly curved.- no other breakage was found at the bending tube.Inspection result of bending function: - to angulate the subject device, it is important that the a-wire smoothly moves in coil pipe and the bending tube moves smoothly.- omsc inspected the device, ns unit side and control section unit side separately, because the device was cut.- omsc confirmed that the bending section smoothly moved, pulling the exposed a-wire from breaking point of ns unit - omsc confirmed the a-wire smoothly moved in coil pipe, moving coil pipe covering a-wire in control body.Disassembly inspection: - cable support of bending tube was broken and fell into the bending tube as identified by ct.Other breakage was not found at the bending tube.Reproduction by test device: - omsc replicated the state of cable support fallen into the bending tube with test device and conducted reproduction test.The bending tube did not get stuck by operating the angulation control lever under this condition.Bending tube stuck was not reproduced even under the identified nonconformity (breakage of cable support) occurring condition.Omsc confirmed the following, asking the user via olympus china: - before not being able to withdraw the device, the user performed lithotomy.- it is in inferior calix where the distal end was caught.- bending tube was angulated toward down 180 degree.- the user cut ns-unit, but the angulated range was not changed.- after laparotomy, the user withdrew the device by straightening the distal end with tweezers.- the user confirmed that there was no calculus between the device and the inferior calix during laparotomy.However, omsc presumes that the distal end was actually touched by hard material in inferior calix because scratches were found at a-rubber of the subject device.Omsc reviewed the manufacture history (dhr) of the subject device and confirmed no irregularity.The exact cause of the reported phenomenon could not be conclusively determined.However, based upon the information from olympus china and investigation result of the omsc, omsc surmised that the reported phenomenon was attributed to the distal end being contacted with hard material such as calculus in inferior calix.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Type of Device
URETERO-RENO VIDEOSCOPE
Manufacturer (Section D)
OLYMPUS MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORP.
2951 ishikawa-cho
hachioji-shi, tokyo-to 192-8 507
JA  192-8507
MDR Report Key12006651
MDR Text Key256468119
Report Number8010047-2021-07588
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGB
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K172246
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,user facility
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/10/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberURF-V2
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/01/2021
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/22/2021
Initial Date FDA Received06/16/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received09/15/2021
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/10/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-