It was reported that there was an issue with fj700r - tspace titanium insertion instr.Str.According to the complaint description, the cage loosened during implantation, threaded rod broken.An additional medical intervention was necessary.Surgery was completed successfully.Additional information was not available.Additional patient information is not available.The adverse event is filed under aag reference (b)(4).Involved components: sj333t - tspace titanium implant 5° 26x12x13mm - 52464105.
|
Investigation results: visual investigation: investigation was carried out visually and microscopically.The instrument arrived in common with a implant sj333t.It was clearly visible, that the thread on the instrument tip is broken off.We made a visual inspection of the instrument and the implant.At the instrument we found the threaded tip at the instrument / implant interface broken off, the broken off part was not enclosed.The magnification of the fracture surface exhibit an 70% forced fracture.The arrest- lines on the fracture surface (red circular- lined area) were a hint,that the threaded tip was pre- damaged before the surgery.In the next step we investigated the implant.Here we found deformations / dents in the area of the implant / instrument interface.This is a clear sign for strong leverage during inserting the implant in the spine.The threaded hole of the implant is in a proper condition, it shows no rest of the broken off instrument tip.Batch history review: the device quality and manufacturing history records have been checked for all leading device(s) lot numbers and were found to be according to our specifications valid at the time of production.Review of the complaint history revealed that no similar complaints have been filed against products from this batch number.The review of risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level (severity 2 (5) x probability of occurrence 1(5) according to din en iso 14971 is still acceptable.Explanation and rationale: the damages on the implant interface are a sure evidence for using/applying a too high force.A material failure or a manufacturing error can be excluded.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results, the root cause of the problem is most probably usage related.There is no indication for a material, manufacturing or design related failure.Based upon the investigations results a capa is not necessary.
|