It was reported by the patient that he has been in a lot of pain since surgery.The spf was removed in may 2017.The patient stated that his pain was half as bad after the removal of the spf unit.The patient stated that he is still in pain and can hardly walk.The patient stated that there were 2 recalls for the spf; 1st recall was for infection, 2nd recall was for toxic chemicals which caused tissue damage, organ damage and nerve damage.The patient requested spf mri information.*(spf manual emailed to patient) the patient requested a call back to discuss recall, as he would like to forward the information to his doctor to see if he can get rid of the pain.No additional patient consequences have been reported.
|
Corrections - b4: date of this report added, d3: manufacturer address and email address, d4: udi, e: occupation, g1: contact office and manufacturer site, g6: report type additional information - h4: device manufacture date, h6: impact code, method, results, and conclusions, h10: additional narrative, h11.This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional and corrected information.The device was not returned to (b)(6) medical for evaluation.The reported event was unable to be confirmed due to limited information received from the customer.The device history record was reviewed, and no discrepancies related to the reported event were found.Root cause was unable to be determined as the necessary information to adequately investigate the reported event was not provided.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.(b)(6) medical will continue to monitor for trends.
|
It was reported by the patient that he has been in a lot of pain since surgery.The spf was removed in (b)(6) 2017.The patient stated that his pain was half as bad after the removal of the spf unit.The patient stated that he is still in pain and can hardly walk.The patient stated that there were 2 recalls for the spf; 1st recall was for infection, 2nd recall was for toxic chemicals which caused tissue damage, organ damage and nerve damage.The patient requested spf mri information.*(spf manual emailed to patient) the patient requested a call back to discuss recall, as he would like to forward the information to his doctor to see if he can get rid of the pain.No additional patient consequences have been reported.
|