| Catalog Number |
0010103 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/21/2020
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol kugel hernia patch on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the kugel hernia patch.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 ¿ patient was diagnosed with umbilical hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of kugel patch (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿the hernia was reduced, and a circular kugel patch (device 1) was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2017 ¿ patient was diagnosed with right inguinal hernia and ventral hernia thereby underwent robotic assisted repair with implant of synthetic mesh and laparoscopic repair with implant of synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the ventral hernia with adhesions were taken down.A synthetic mesh was placed into position of the right inguinal region.A synthetic mesh was placed over the ventral defect and tacked.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio st mesh (device 2) and removal of kugel patch (device 1) and synthetic mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the kugel patch (device 1) and the synthetic mesh were fully removed.A ventrio st mesh (device 2) was placed in the intraperitoneal space and secured using sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|