|
COVIDIEN MFG SOLUTIONS S.A. DIALYSIS UNKNOWN; CATHETER, PERITONEAL, LONG-TERM INDWELLING
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
DIALYSIS UNKNOWN |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Break (1069)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Unintended Radiation Exposure (4565)
|
| Date of Event |
05/08/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, there was a presence of abnormally diluted blood, presence of air bubbles and abnormally high pressure as soon as the patient connected to the dialysis generator.Emergency disconnection of the patient, change of the dialysis and generator circuit and reconnecting the patient to the new machine were done but the situation recurred.Disconnection of the patient in emergency was done again.Radio with opacification of the central venous catheter made urgently.Demonstration of the opacification of the two ways while the product was injected only in one way, result was in favor of a cracked catheter.The catheter was not repaired.It was said that there was a leak at the catheter shaft.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, there was a presence of abnormally diluted blood, presence of air bubbles and abnormally high pressure as soon as the patient connected to the dialysis generator.Emergency disconnection of the patient, change of the dialysis and generator circuit and reconnecting the patient to the new machine were done but the situation recurred.Disconnection of the patient in emergency was done again.Radio with opacification of the central venous catheter made urgently.Demonstration of the opacification of the two ways while the product was injected only in one way, result was in favor of a cracked catheter.It was said that there was a leak at the catheter shaft.Nothing unusual observed prior to connection of the patient to the dialysis generator.The catheter was not repaired.The cleaning agent was not allowed to dry thoroughly prior to dressing the area and prior to applying ointment to the area.The patient was not responsible for any type of catheter maintenance (cleaning, dressing changes, etc.).The cleaning agents were not ever switched over the life of the catheter.Cleaning agents were not ever mixed.The site did not ever use sepsiderm to clean catheter.There was no protocol change for cleaning agents used recently.The patient was not using any type of cleaning agent or antibiotic on the catheter.Flushing was not done prior to use.No other products being utilized with the device.There was no blood transfusion required.Treatment was completed.It was said that the patient went to the operating room to change the catheter for a new one as intervention and to resolve the crack issue.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: g3, h3, h6 correction: e1(facility name) h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.The evaluation found no potentially contributing factors, and the sample met all related specifications.It was reported that there was a crack on the catheter shaft.The reported issue could not be confirmed.The most likely cause could not be identified because no related problem was detected with the device.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: b5, g3 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, there was a presence of abnormally diluted blood, presence of air bubbles and abnormally high pressure as soon as the patient connected to the dialysis generator.Emergency disconnection of the patient, change of the dialysis and generator circuit and reconnecting the patient to the new machine were done but the situation recurred.Disconnection of the patient in emergency was done again.Radio with opacification of the central venous catheter was made urgently.Demonstration of the opacification of the two ways while the product was injected only in one way, result was in favor of a cracked catheter.It was said that there was a leak at the catheter shaft.Nothing unusual observed prior to connection of the patient to the dialysis generator.The catheter was not repaired.The cleaning agent was not allowed to dry thoroughly prior to dressing the area and prior to applying ointment to the area.The patient was not responsible for any type of catheter maintenance (cleaning, dressing changes, etc.).The cleaning agents were not ever switched over the life of the catheter.Cleaning agents were not ever mixed.The site did not ever use sepsiderm to clean catheter.There was no protocol change for cleaning agents used recently.The patient was not using any type of cleaning agent or antibiotic on the catheter.Flushing was not done prior to use.No other products being utilized with the device.There was no blood transfusion required.Treatment was completed.It was said that the patient went to the operating room to change the catheter for a new one as intervention and to resolve the crack issue.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information: b5, d6a, d9, g3, h3, h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, there was a presence of abnormally diluted blood, presence of air bubbles and abnormally high pressure as soon as the patient connected to the dialysis generator.Emergency disconnection of the patient, change of the dialysis and generator circuit and reconnecting the patient to the new machine were done but the situation recurred.Disconnection of the patient in emergency was done again.Radio with opacification of the peritoneal dialysis catheter was made urgently.Demonstration of the opacification of the two ways while the product was injected only in one way, result was in favor of a cracked catheter.It was said that there was a leak at the catheter shaft.Nothing unusual observed prior to connection of the patient to the dialysis generator.The catheter was not repaired.The cleaning agent was not allowed to dry thoroughly prior to dressing the area and prior to applying ointment to the area.The patient was not responsible for any type of catheter maintenance (cleaning, dressing changes, etc.).The cleaning agents were not ever switched over the life of the catheter.Cleaning agents were not ever mixed.The site did not ever use sepsiderm to clean catheter.There was no protocol change for cleaning agents used recently.The patient was not using any type of cleaning agent or antibiotic on the catheter.Flushing was not done prior to use.No other products being utilized with the device.There was no blood transfusion required.Treatment was completed.It was said that the patient went to the operating room to change the catheter for a new one as intervention and to resolve the crack issue.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: b5 additional information: g3.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
According to the reporter, there was a presence of abnormally diluted blood, presence of air bubbles and abnormally high pressure as soon as the patient connected to the dialysis generator.Emergency disconnection of the patient, change of the dialysis and generator circuit and reconnecting the patient to the new machine were done but the situation recurred.Disconnection of the patient in emergency was done again.Radiography with opacification of the central venous catheter was made urgently.Demonstration of the opacification of the two ways was done while the product was injected only in one way and the result was in favor of a cracked catheter.It was said that there was a leak at the catheter shaft.Nothing unusual observed prior to connection of the patient to the dialysis generator.The catheter was not repaired.The cleaning agent was not allowed to dry thoroughly prior to dressing the area and prior to applying ointment to the area.The patient was not responsible for any type of catheter maintenance (cleaning, dressing changes, etc.).The cleaning agents were not ever switched over the life of the catheter.Cleaning agents were not ever mixed.The site did not ever use sepsiderm to clean catheter.There was no protocol change for cleaning agents used recently.The patient was not using any type of cleaning agent or antibiotic on the catheter.Flushing was not done prior to use.No other products being utilized with the device.There was no blood transfusion required.Treatment was completed.It was said that the patient went to the operating room to change the catheter for a new one as intervention and to resolve the crack issue.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|