It was reported that the physician did a bilateral subthalamic nucleus (stn) lead placement and expressed that he had difficulty making the clip snap into the stimloc base.They did not visibly see any excess nylon molding.There were no factors that may have led or contributed to the issue.New stimlocs were offered but the physician declined and stated that he was able to force the caps into the stimloc base.Additional information was received from a healthcare provider (hcp), via the manufacturer¿s representative (rep) who reported during a stage 2 case the lead was checked using the twistlock cable and it was found there were low impedances on contact pairings 3/0 and 2/1 (ranging from 91-104).The surgeon removed the lead from the twistlock cable, inspected it, and wiped it down with a wet then dry sponge.The surgeon tested again with the same results.Impedances were tested on 0.7, 1.5, and 3.0 v with the same results with the lead appearing to be intact.The surgeon the connected the extension wire and neurostimulator,and the same results appeared during the impedance check.The surgeon decided to the leave the lead as is and considered replacing it in the future.It was noted that during the stage 1 case the surgeon pushed the lead down deeper due to it being found to be 3 mm superior to the intended plan an d it was suspected this could have potentially unknowingly caused the impedance issue.
|