• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

WILLIAM COOK EUROPE COOK CELECT FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET; DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number IGTCFS-65-FEM-CELECT-PERM
Device Problems Difficult to Remove (1528); Structural Problem (2506); Device Tipped Over (2589); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Internal Organ Perforation (1987); Perforation of Vessels (2135); Anxiety (2328); Depression (2361); Suicidal Ideation (4429); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Catalog # is unknown but referred to as celect.Occupation: non-healthcare professional.Investigation: it has not been possible to further investigate or evaluate this alleged event based on the limited information and/or no device failure provided to date.Catalog number and lot number are unknown, however, the alleged celect is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.
 
Event Description
It is alleged that the patient received a celect inferior vena cava (ivc) filter on (b)(6) 2008, and the patient was injured without further explanation.Hospital and medical records have been requested, but not yet provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.The following fields were updated per additional information received: a2, a4, b1, b2, b5, b6, b7, d1, d4, g4, h4, annex e, annex f, annex a, annex b, annex c, annex d, and h6.Investigation: the following allegations have been investigated: rt iliopsoas muscle/vc perf, unable to remove, tilt, calcification, anxiety/depression, suicidal.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter interacts with ivc wall, e.G.Penetration/perforation/embedment.This may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Potential causes may include improper deployment; and (or) excessive force or manipulations near an in-situ filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: trauma to adjacent structures, vascular trauma, vena cava perforation, vena cava penetration.Physician practice guidelines and published guidance from regulatory agencies recommend that patients with indwelling filters undergo routine follow-up.The risks/benefits of filter retrieval should be considered for each patient during follow-up.Once protection from pe is no longer necessary, filter retrieval should be considered.Filter retrieval should be attempted when feasible and clinically indicated.Filter retrieval is a patient-specific, clinically complex decision; the decision to remove a filter should be based on each patient¿s individual risk/benefit profile (e.G., a patient¿s continued need for protection from pe compared to their experience with and (or) ongoing risk of experiencing filter-related complications).For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.The filter is designed to be retrieved with the günther tulip vena cava filter retrieval set.It may also be retrieved with the cloversnare® vascular retriever.Cook has not performed testing to evaluate the safety or effectiveness of filter retrieval using other retrieval systems or techniques.The published clinical literature includes descriptions of alternative techniques for filter retrieval; use of these techniques varies according to physician experience, patient anatomy, and filter position.The safety or effectiveness of these alternative retrieval techniques has not been established.Specific for ¿embedded¿ a filter that is embedded in the wall of the ivc may be difficult to retrieve.For all retrievable ivc filters, retrieval becomes more challenging with time, and this is commonly due to encapsulation of the filter legs or hook (in a tilted filter) by tissue ingrowth.Filter tilt has been reported.Potential causes may include filter placement in ivcs with diameters larger than those specified in these instructions for use; improper deployment; manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter); and (or) a failed retrieval attempt.Excessive filter tilt may contribute to difficult or failed retrieval; vena cava wall penetration/perforation; and (or) result in loss of filter efficiency.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: unacceptable filter tilt.Unknown if the reported calcification, anxiety/depression, suicidal are directly related to the filter and unable to identify a corresponding failure mode at this point in time.8 devices in lot.No relevant notes on work order.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Patient allegedly received an implant on (b)(6) 2008 due to deep vein thrombosis (dvt)/pulmonary embolism (pe).The patient alleges unable to remove.The patient further alleges anxiety, suicidal, and depression.Attempted filter removal (b)(6) 2018 due to doctor recommendation.(b)(6) 2020, per a report from computed tomography; ¿ivc filter: ivc filter is noted with the proximal tip 1.3cm distal to the origin of the right renal vein.The proximal tip abuts the anteromedial ivc wall with associated mild anterior tilt measuring approximately 10 degrees and mild right to left tilt measuring 10 degrees.The ivc filter struts extend up to 5 mm beyond the lumen of the ivc wall with one of the struts extending into the anterior right iliopsoas muscle.There is a small calcification in the right iliopsoas muscle in this area, which may be related to the ivc filter or prior trauma.The ivc filter is intact without evidence of strut fracture or bending.No ivc stenosis is identified.¿.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unavailable, or unchanged.The following fields were updated per additional information received: b5, b6, annex a, annex g, annex b, annex c, annex d, and h6.Investigation the following allegations have been investigated: fracture and organ perforation.Investigation is reopened due to additional information provided.The reported allegations have been further investigated based on the information provided to date.Filter fracture has been reported and may be either symptomatic or asymptomatic.Fracture of a filter leg may be due to repetitive motion on a filter leg in an unusual, stressed position, such as a filter leg penetrating/perforating the ivc; or a filter leg being caught in a side branch (e.G., a renal vein).Other potential causes of filter fracture may include excessive force or manipulations near an implanted filter (e.G., a surgical or endovascular procedure in the vicinity of a filter).Retrieval of a fractured filter or filter fragments (including embolized fragments) using endovascular techniques has been reported.Potential adverse events that may occur include, but are not limited to, the following: filter fracture, filter or filter fragment embolization, trauma to adjacent structures.The additional information regarding organ perforation does not change the previous investigation results for vena cava perforation.8 devices in lot.No relevant notes on work order.The product is manufactured and inspected according to specifications.No evidence to suggest that this device was not manufactured according to specifications and nothing indicates that the filter did not perform as intended, e.G.Intended for the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via placement in the vena cava.Cook will reopen its investigation if further information is received warranting supplementation in accordance with 21 c.F.R.803.56.This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up medwatch report will be submitted if additional relevant information becomes available.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, or that any cook device caused or contributed to or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
 
Event Description
Additional information provided the filter was placed via the right common femoral vein.(b)(6) 2020, per a report from computed tomography 2; ¿ivc filter with: 6 mm small bowel, 8 mm vertebral, and 8 mm mesenteric perforation.Tilting with the apex against the ivc wall.A fractured posterior lateral strut.No stenosis, or migration.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COOK CELECT FEMORAL VENA CAVA FILTER SET
Type of Device
DTK FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer (Section G)
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov
Manufacturer Contact
lissi walmann
sandet 6, dk-4632
bjaeverskov 
56868686
MDR Report Key12038054
MDR Text Key257460668
Report Number3002808486-2021-01374
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K073374
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/05/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberIGTCFS-65-FEM-CELECT-PERM
Device Lot NumberE2039711
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/27/2021
Initial Date FDA Received06/21/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/03/2021
07/21/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/03/2021
08/05/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/20/2007
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight91 KG
-
-