• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9600TFX29
Event Date 05/28/2021
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
The edwards sapien 3 transcatheter heart valve, and accessories are indicated for relief of aortic stenosis in patients with symptomatic heart disease due to severe native calcific aortic stenosis who are judged by a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, to be at low risk for open surgical therapy (i.E., predicted risk of surgical mortality >=1% at 30 days, based on the society of thoracic surgeons (sts) risk score and other clinical co-morbidities unmeasured by the sts risk calculator).The edwards sapien 3 transcatheter heart valve, and accessories are indicated for patients with symptomatic heart disease due to failure (stenosed, insufficient, or combined) of a surgical bioprosthetic aortic or mitral valve who are judged by a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, to be at low risk for open surgical therapy (i.E., predicted risk of surgical mortality = 8% at 30 days, based on the sts risk score and other clinical co-morbidities unmeasured by the sts risk calculator).The device was used in an off-label implantation in the mitral position.As there are no specific ifu or training materials related to mitral procedures, the available training materials were reviewed only for information potentially relevant to the device use.Valve migration requiring intervention is a potential adverse event associated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement.According to literature review, valve migration results when forces acting on the transcatheter heart valve (thv) overcome the strength of attachment of the valve to the aortic wall.Stent valves are subjected to antegrade ejection forces during systole.Less than severe and non-uniformly distributed calcification of the native leaflets, incorrect bioprosthetic valve sizing, and incomplete frame expansion, can contribute to valve migration.Additionally, residual overhanging leaflets can exert downwards force during diastole, causing migration of the thv towards the left ventricle.Paravalvular leak (pvl) is a potential adverse event associated with bioprosthetic heart valves and the transcatheter valve replacement (tvr) procedure.The patient screening manual and the procedure didactic identify several procedural and anatomical factors which could contribute to pvl, including device malposition, inaccurate measurement of the native valve annulus, uneven distribution of calcium on the native valve, bulky or severe calcification, an elliptical annulus shape and valve under sizing.The edwards thv patient screening manual advises the operator on pre-procedure assessment of the mitral valve, taking into consideration the degree and distribution of native leaflet calcification.The procedural didactic instructs the operator on proper positioning and deployment of the valve, including all procedural and anatomical considerations.Physicians are extensively trained by edwards before they are qualified to use the transcatheter heart valve (thv).Training includes patient screening, device preparation, approach, deployment, imaging, procedure specific training manuals and proctored procedures.The correct sizing, alignment and positioning of the device are emphasized as key factors to the placement and fixation of the device.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a device malfunction contributed to this adverse event.The cause of the migration and subsequent pvl cannot be determined, however, may be related to patient/procedural factors.Training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
 
Event Description
As reported from our affiliates in (b)(6), during a trans-subclavian transcatheter mitral valve replacement (tmvr) with a 29mm sapien 3 valve in mitral annular calcification(mac), post implant, the valve migrated toward the left atrium and paravalvular leak (pvl) was noted.The patient became unstable and a second sapien 3 valve was implanted successfully.The patient did not recover from the cardiogenic shock and expired on post-operative day 3.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, MITRAL VALVE, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key12042502
MDR Text Key257473760
Report Number2015691-2021-03716
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,u
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/22/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9600TFX29
Device Catalogue NumberN/A
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 05/31/2021
Initial Date FDA Received06/22/2021
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
-
-