|
STRYKER GMBH LOCKING COMPRESSION PLATE AXSOS 10 HOLE / L136MM 4.0MM LOCKING SET; PLATE, FIXATION, BONE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
427010 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
03/13/2019
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The information in this report was provided by stryker legal affairs department.No additional information is available currently due to the ongoing litigation.Should additional information become available, the evaluation summary will be submitted in a supplemental report.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly on (b)(6) 2019 the patient tripped, fell, and broke the humerus bone in her right arm and underwent surgery on (b)(6) 2019 with implantation of a compression plate.It is further alleged that on (b)(6) 2019 she "was in the process of pushing her hair back behind her ear when suddenly the compression plate snapped, causing her humerus bone to re-break, and the metal was pushing her bone to protrude outward and consequently causing her immense pain." allegedly the patient underwent revision surgery to repair the rebroken humerus bone and to reinstall a new compression plate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported through the filing of a lawsuit that allegedly on (b)(6) 2019 the patient tripped, fell, and broke the humerus bone in her right arm and underwent surgery on (b)(6), 2019 with implantation of a compression plate.It is further alleged that on (b)(6) 2019 she "was in the process of pushing her hair back behind her ear when suddenly the compression plate snapped, causing her humerus bone to re-break, and the metal was pushing her bone to protrude outward and consequently causing her immense pain." allegedly the patient underwent revision surgery to repair the rebroken humerus bone and to reinstall a new compression plate.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction: please refer to section d- catalog, lot and gtin number, g1 reporting contact, h6 method, results code.The reported event could be confirmed, since the broken plate is visible on the received picture set.A device inspection was not possible since the affected device was not returned, the review of the received pictures has shown that the plate is broken apart at the 5th hole.The catalog- and as well the lot number can be confirmed.The pictures were reviewed by the internal chemistry laboratory, based on the pictures it can be stated that the fracture originated from the lower left hand corner.The overall fracture mode of this image is fatigue.However, complete fracture analysis requires the physical part and associated manufacturing details of the subassembly in focus to determine potential stress risers, inclusions, surface properties, etc.To investigate further and ultimately determine a most likely root cause.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.More detailed information, like patient detail, x-ray or operation reports, about the complaint event as well as the affected device must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.The evaluation of the pictures has shown that there was a fatigue breakage of the plate.In this relation following statement from the instructions for use can be mentioned: [these devices can break when subjected to the increased loading associated with delayed unions and/or non-unions.Internal fixation devices are load sharing devices which are intended to hold fractured bone surfaces in apposition to facilitate healing.If healing is delayed or does not occur, the appliance may eventually break due to metal fatigue.Loads on the device produced by load bearing and the patient¿s activity level will dictate the longevity of the device.]" [original statements].If the device is returned or if any additional information is provided, the investigation will be reassessed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|