| Model Number |
TMPX295 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available (4581)
|
| Date of Event |
04/16/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: patient dissatisfaction with procedure outcome.(b)(4).Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a female patient who underwent breast surgery with a 295cc mentor memorygel xtra breast implant experienced dissatisfaction of implant on an unspecified side post procedure.As a result, patient had an explantation on (b)(6) 2021.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2021 the mentor failure analysis lab has received the device for evaluation.The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on (b)(6) 2021.Device evaluation summary: according to the information received, the patient dislikes the product.The product was returned to mentor for evaluation.Mentor conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.During the visual evaluation, no apparent damage or visual anomalies were observed on the siltex mod+prof xtra 295cc returned device.As part of mentor¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On (b)(6) 2021 the mentor failure analysis lab has received a photo of the device for evaluation.The investigation of the returned device was completed by the failure analysis lab on (b)(6) 2021.Device evaluation summary: according to the information received, the patient dislikes the product.Upon visual evaluation of the image provided in the complaint, the implant was observed intact.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|