• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDIVANCE, INC. ¿ 1725056 ARCTIC SUN® 5000; ARCTIC SUN DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDIVANCE, INC. ¿ 1725056 ARCTIC SUN® 5000; ARCTIC SUN DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number 50000000E
Device Problem Biocompatibility (2886)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/01/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.The device was not returned.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the inquirer wanted to know that they should warm the neonate temperature due to low heart rate and asked if there was any supporting literature.Inquirer raised question was there any literature that support low heart rate parameters while cooling neonates.If the neonate had a heart rate (hr) of 65, should they continue cooling at 33.5 c or increase the temperature.Anything on consideration of medication administrated, electrolyte shifts or other vital sign parameters with a low heart rate.Nurse was not currently with the device and stated that knew how to make changes to the device if needed.Patient temperature was 33.5 c, neonate heart rate (hr) was 65 bpm.Nurse stated blood pressure (bp) was acceptable, no pain, no seizures and o2 saturation was 100 percentage.Patient was on fentanyl drip and ativan pushes.Mss explained to nurse decision regarding changes to temperature due to low heart rate (hr) will have to be determined by medical team.Nurse stated they might decide to decrease fentanyl.Mss reminded the nurse of electrolyte shifts during temperature changes and let nurse knew the request for literature will be sent to our medical affairs team.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported issue was unconfirmed.The root cause of the reported issue could not be determined, as the issue was not with the unit.Inquirer raised question was there any literature that supports low heart rate parameters while cooling neonates.The device was not returned for evaluation.The lot number is unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.The reported event is unconfirmed, labeling/packaging review is not required.H11: section a through f - the information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the inquirer wanted to know that they should warm the neonate temperature due to low heart rate and asked if there was any supporting literature.Inquirer raised question was there any literature that support low heart rate parameters while cooling neonates.If the neonate had a heart rate (hr) of 65, should they continue cooling at 33.5 c or increase the temperature.Anything on consideration of medication administrated, electrolyte shifts or other vital sign parameters with a low heart rate.Nurse was not currently with the device and stated that knew how to make changes to the device if needed.Patient temperature was 33.5 c, neonate heart rate (hr) was 65 bpm.Nurse stated blood pressure (bp) was acceptable, no pain, no seizures and o2 saturation was 100 percentage.Patient was on fentanyl drip and ativan pushes.Mss explained to nurse decision regarding changes to temperature due to low heart rate (hr) will have to be determined by medical team.Nurse stated they might decide to decrease fentanyl.Mss reminded the nurse of electrolyte shifts during temperature changes and let nurse knew the request for literature will be sent to our medical affairs team.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARCTIC SUN® 5000
Type of Device
ARCTIC SUN DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDIVANCE, INC. ¿ 1725056
321 s taylor ave
suite 200
louisville 80027
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDIVANCE, INC. ¿ 1725056
321 s taylor ave
suite 200
louisville 80027
Manufacturer Contact
yonic anderson
8195 industrial blvd
covington 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key12067689
MDR Text Key258644487
Report Number1018233-2021-03806
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWJ
UDI-Device Identifier00801741127755
UDI-Public(01)00801741127755
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K161602
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/25/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number50000000E
Device Catalogue Number50000000E
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-