|
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).The lot number was unknown.Investigation summary: the complaint device was received at the service center and evaluated.It was reported that the device had internal error.Per service reports, this complaint can be confirmed.During the service evaluation the following defects were identified: error code - 200, physical damage, loose components - connector/coupler, minor scratches on the unit.The parts were replaced to resolve the issues.After repair, the device was found to be working according to the specifications.The faulty parts was identified as the root cause for the device failure during the service evaluation.Manufacturing record evaluation is not required as the reported event is not associated with the manufacturing process and/or the potential cause of the defect cannot be associated to manufacturing.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.Depuy mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|
|
It was reported by the affiliate in that preoperatively to a shoulder arthroscopy procedure on (b)(6) 2021, it was observed that the vapr3 generator device had an unspecified internal error.During in-house engineering evaluation, it was determined that the device had an error code - 200.Another like device was used to complete the procedure without delay.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.No additional information was provided.
|