| Model Number |
PRW35 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Mechanics Altered (2984); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding (1888)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date of event: only event year known: 2021.Batch # unknown.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and preventive action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.The lot/batch was not provided; therefore, the manufacturing records evaluation could not be performed.Additional information was requested, and the following was received: what surgical procedure was performed? posterior interbody lumbar fusion.Does the surgeon believe that there was an alleged deficiency with the prw35 skin stapler or was the condition of the patient¿s skin a contributing factor? the surgeon believes the deficiency was with the prw35 stapler, he doesn't not believe the skin was a contributing factor nor any different than a normal case.Where were the staples placed? to close the incision in the posterior lumbar spine.Were there any issues noted with staple formation/placement during the initial procedure? if yes, please explain.The clinical team stated that the staples may have been sitting proud, not completely forming but were holding in skin so they elected to leave them alone at time of implant how this issue addressed during re-op (sutured, re-stapled)? the areas distal 1/3 of the incision where the oozing was coming from was sutured was there a wound infection? no.Was the bleeding coming through the skin stapler staple line? yes.Why was the patient taken back to the operating room for this issue? there was noticeable leaking and oozing and concern the incision was not properly closed and wouldn't heal with the current staples in it.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be field as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that they had to bring a patient back in to the operating room on saturday after a friday case due to skin staples not holding the incision closed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 08/12/2021.This is an analysis of a photo submitted to ethicon endo surgery for evaluation.During the visual analysis, the following was observed: the photo shows a clip line on the skin and a surgical instrument can be seen between the clips and the skin.However, due to skin on staples proper/improper form of staples cannot be determined.Based on the photo review, the event described cannot be confirmed, however, no conclusion or root cause could be determined.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4).Date sent: 07/29/2021.Photo received and is pending review.When the review is completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent with a summary of the photographic evaluation.Additional information received: the nurse practitioner does the closing independently with no help.Forceps are used to evert the skin edges, there has been no changes in her technique and has over 10 years of experience.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|