|
As reported, during an up and over aortic bifurcation procedure and using a flexor ansel guiding sheath, two check flow valves disconnected during the catheter exchange.The physician had the sheath in place.When he attempted to do the catheter exchange, the valve disconnected from the sheath.The sheath was removed from the patient and replaced with another sheath from the same lot number.It advanced into the patient normally, but once again the check flo valve disconnected when the attempted to do the catheter exchange.They removed this sheath as well.The procedure was completed by using a terumo sheath.No unintended part of the device remained inside the patient's body.No additional procedure was required due to this occurrence.No adverse effect was reported due to this occurrence.Additional patient and event information has been requested.
|
|
Additional information was received 07jul2021: the patient had no tortuous, scarred, or calcified anatomy.The sheath was in place for approximately one hour for the first, and the second was disconnected within approximately 15 minutes.The separation occurred when the doctor pulled back on the catheter inside of the sheath to exchange for another catheter.The dilator was not in place at the time of separation.No resistance was felt during insertion or removal.There was minimal blood loss and no transfusion was required.No additional interventions were required.Hep saline, contrast, peripheral stent, catheters, angio balloon, and wires were used during the procedure.
|
|
Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, unchanged, or unavailable.Description of event: as reported, during an up and over aortic bifurcation procedure and using a flexor ansel guiding sheath, two check flow valves disconnected during the catheter exchange.The physician had the sheath in place.When he attempted to do the catheter exchange, the valve disconnected from the sheath.The sheath was removed from the patient and replaced with another sheath from the same lot number.It advanced into the patient normally, but once again the check flo valve disconnected when the attempted to do the catheter exchange.They removed this sheath as well.The sheath was in place for approximately one hour for the first, and the second was disconnected within approximately 15 minutes.The dilator was not in place at the time of separation.No resistance was felt during insertion or removal.There was minimal blood loss and no transfusion was required.The procedure was completed by using a terumo sheath.The patient had no tortuous, scarred, or calcified anatomy.Investigation ¿ evaluation: a visual inspection of the returned device was conducted.A document based investigation was also performed including a review of complaint history, device history record, the instructions for use, manufacturing instructions, and quality control data.The customer returned kcfw-7.0-18/38-45-rb-anl1-hc to cook for investigation.Physical examination of the returned device showed: visual inspection results, two devices returned in used condition.The sheaths were separated from the check flo hubs on both devices.There was damage section approximately 4.5cm long on one of the sheaths just above the proximal end where it pulled out of the check flo hub.There is no evidence from device failure analysis that the complaint was manufactured out of specification.A review of the device history record found no non-conformances related to the reported failure mode.Because there are no related non-conformances, adequate inspection activities have been established, there is objective evidence that the dhr was fully executed, and no other lot related complaints that have been received from the field, it was concluded that there is no evidence that nonconforming product exists in house or in field.The instructions for use (ifu), provides the following information to the user related to the reported failure mode: "warnings¿ ¿if resistance is encountered during advancement of flexor sheath, assess cause of resistance and consider dilation of any restriction identified or consider alternate treatment strategy.If flexor sheath is advanced through resistance, force to remove the sheath will be higher, increasing the risk of sheath material or hub separation upon withdrawal.¿ ¿reinsertion of dilator prior to removal of flexor sheath increases the strength of the sheath and lessens the risk of device separation.If resistance i anticipated or encountered during withdrawal of flexor sheath, consider carefully reinserting the dilator prior to continuing removal.¿ ¿precautions¿ ¿in order to ensure device compatibility, choose a sheath size large enough to accommodate the maximum outer diameter of any devices that will be placed through the sheath.¿ ¿all interventional or diagnostic instruments used with this product should move freely through the valve and sheath to avoid damage.¿ ¿how supplied¿ ¿upon removal from package, inspect the product to ensure no damage has occurred.¿ a review of relevant manufacturing documents was conducted.It was concluded that the device aspect in question was visually/functionally inspected by quality control and no related gaps in production or processing controls were noted.Cook has concluded a component failure contributed to this failure mode.Per the quality engineering risk assessment, no further action is warranted.Cook will continue to monitor this device via the complaints database for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803.This report is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement made in it is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned; that a death or serious injury occurred; or that any cook device caused or contributed to; or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|