• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV VALVE; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG PROGAV VALVE; HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number FV410T
Medical Device Problem Code Mechanical Problem (1384)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Hydrocephalus (3272)
Date of Event 06/01/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation: visual inspection: a slight deformation of the outer housing of the progav valve was observed through the visual inspection.The progav valve housing was subsequently measured and confirmed/indicated the presence of a deformation.The housing deformation measured at -0.40 mm, outside the tolerance of 0 ± 0.02 mm.Permeability test: a permeability test has shown that the valve is permeable.Adjustment test: the progav was tested and is adjustable to all specified pressures.Braking force and brake function test: the brake functionality test has shown that the brake function did not operate as expected.The results indicate that the rotor no longer performs as required.Result: first, we performed a visual inspection of the progav.A deformation of the outer housing of the progav valve was observed through the visual inspection.This deformation was confirmed through a measurement of the plan parallelity.Next, we tested the permeability, adjustability, as well as the brake functionality.The brake function did not operate as expected, but all other specifications were met.Finally, we have dismantled the valve.Inside the valve we have found a build-up of substances (likely protein).Based on our investigation, we can determine that the progav had a brake malfunction at the time of our investigation.This is likely due to a deformation of the outer housing of the progav valve and due to the deposits observed inside the valve.Significant outside pressure, for example by too much force from the progav adjustment tool or by a fall or impact to the head of the patient, can compromise the integrity of the valve.As described in scientific literature, deposits caused by natural substances present in the liquor, such as protein, blood or tissue particles, are among the known and inevitable risks of hc-therapy by shunt implants.We can exclude a defect at the time of release.The valve met all specifications of the final inspection when released from christoph miethke gmbh & co.Kg.No further regulatory actions are required from our point of view.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a progav (#fv410t) was implanted during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.According to the complainant, the valve was believed to have a problem with the adjustability.The patient underwent a revision procedure.The complainant device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.No patient complications were reported as a result of the revision procedure.Age: (b)(6) height: 140 cm weight: (b)(6) gender: male.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROGAV VALVE
Common Device Name
HYDROCEPHALUS MANAGEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CHRISTOPH MIETHKE GMBH & CO KG
ulanenweg 2
potsdam, 14469
GM  14469
MDR Report Key12086499
Report Number3004721439-2021-00173
Device Sequence Number3348682
Product Code JXG
UDI-Device Identifier04041906132071
UDI-Public4041906132071
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryGM
PMA/510(K) Number
K103003
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2015
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,user f
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 06/29/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/30/2020
Device Model NumberFV410T
Device Catalogue NumberFV410T
Device Lot Number20027194
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/04/2021
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/04/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date06/29/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age10 YR
Patient Weight30
-
-