|
|
| Catalog Number |
0010215 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001); Migration (4003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/26/2017
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-oct-2014) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, a4, b2(outcomes attributed to adv ev), b3, b4, b5, b7, d3 (manufacturer), d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., expiry date), g1, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventrio on (b)(6) 2015.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventrio.Attorney alleges general allegations for "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient.¿ it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic converted to open repair with implant of ventrio mesh.Per operative notes, ¿the adhesions of small bowel to hernia sac were taken down.The hernia sac was identified with loops of small bowel were released.The hernia sac was dissected free.A ventrio mesh was placed using prolene sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2017 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with sutures.Per operative notes, ¿the adhesions of midline were taken down.The previously placed mesh was identified, and the lateral edge of the mesh had come loose causing the recurrence.Primary repair was done with sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|