|
|
| Catalog Number |
5959680 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Material Deformation (2976); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
07/28/2008
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2005.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2005.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2005 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent symptomatic incisional hernia thereby underwent robotic repair with the implant of sepramesh ip.Per op notes, ¿there was evidence of hollow visceral involvement with a recurrent incisional hernia.The hernia in the more superior aspect of incision just to right and epigastric.A sepramesh ip was pexied to superior aspect of incision near hernia defect using sutures.¿ on (b)(6) 2008 ¿ patient had abdominal pain and was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per op notes, ¿dense adhesions were lysed.Contracted mesh was removed circumferentially leading to a large defect.The multiple swiss defects were noted.A component separation was performed.A biological mesh was placed overlay and sewn using sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|