• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 SEPRAMESH IP; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 SEPRAMESH IP; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5959680
Medical Device Problem Codes Defective Device (2588); Material Deformation (2976); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 07/28/2008
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2005.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d3, d4, d.6b (date of explant), g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol sepramesh composite ip on (b)(6) 2005.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the sepramesh composite ip.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: on (b)(6) 2005 ¿ patient was diagnosed with recurrent symptomatic incisional hernia thereby underwent robotic repair with the implant of sepramesh ip.Per op notes, ¿there was evidence of hollow visceral involvement with a recurrent incisional hernia.The hernia in the more superior aspect of incision just to right and epigastric.A sepramesh ip was pexied to superior aspect of incision near hernia defect using sutures.¿ on (b)(6) 2008 ¿ patient had abdominal pain and was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with the removal of mesh.Per op notes, ¿dense adhesions were lysed.Contracted mesh was removed circumferentially leading to a large defect.The multiple swiss defects were noted.A component separation was performed.A biological mesh was placed overlay and sewn using sutures.¿.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SEPRAMESH IP
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
4018258495
MDR Report Key12105275
Report Number1213643-2021-05467
Device Sequence Number15386514
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741031823
UDI-Public(01)00801741031823(17)051228(10)05NP070US
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateRI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K063739
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2005
Device Explanted Year2008
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 12/25/2025
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date12/28/2005
Device Catalogue Number5959680
Device Lot Number05NP070US
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/14/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer12/02/2025
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/01/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date12/25/2025
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Disability; Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-