• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LARGE SLAP HAMMER; PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. LARGE SLAP HAMMER; PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 71367553
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/16/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during a revision surgery for a thr due to infection, in one (1) large slap hammer the connection to the trunnion broke.Surgery was resumed, without any delay, with a back-up device.Patient was not injured as consequence of this problem.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the device, used in treatment, was not returned for evaluation but the pictures were reviewed, and the broken instrument was confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, after three requests no relevant clinical information has been provided for inclusion in this medical investigation.Therefore, a thorough medical investigation cannot be rendered nor can the root cause of reported breakage be determined.A single undated, unlabeled photo of a broken device was provided.Per the product complaint form, the sales representative reported, all the broken pieces were retrieved from inside of the patient.Based on the information provided, the surgeon completed the surgery without any delay, with a back-up device.Since the patient was not injured as consequence of this issue, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.A complaint history review found related failures for the listed device; this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are likely probable causes of the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The associated device was returned and evaluated.A visual inspection of the returned device confirmed the stated failure mode.The pin that mates the sleeve to the entire assembly broke, rendering the device inoperative.The device shows signs of extensive use.A review of complaint history based on the historical data revealed similar events for the listed batch, this failure mode will be monitored for future complaints for any necessary corrective actions.The clinical/medical evaluation concluded that after three requests no relevant clinical information has been provided for inclusion in this medical investigation.Therefore, a thorough medical investigation cannot be rendered nor can the root cause of reported breakage be determined.A single undated, unlabeled photo of a broken device was provided.Per the product complaint form, the sales representative reported, all the broken pieces were retrieved from inside of the patient.Based on the information provided, the surgeon completed the surgery without any delay, with a back-up device.Since the patient was not injured as consequence of this issue, no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.A review of the manufacturing records did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.At this time, we do not have reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.Assessment of historical escalated cases concluded that there are no prior actions related to this device and failure mode.A contribution of the device to the reported event could be corroborated as the device shows signs of damage/wear.This device is a reusable instrument that can be exposed to numerous surgeries.Damage from prolonged use, misuse or rough handling are probable causes of the reported event.We recommend that all reusable instruments be routinely inspected for wear and damage and replaced as necessary.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LARGE SLAP HAMMER
Common Device Name
PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
1450 brooks rd.
memphis TN 38116
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key12111738
Report Number1020279-2021-05630
Device Sequence Number14396516
Product Code JDG
UDI-Device Identifier03596010403025
UDI-Public03596010403025
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
K123598
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/01/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number71367553
Device Catalogue Number71367553
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/17/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/23/2021
03/31/2022
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/02/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/24/2021
04/01/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) No
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-