|
|
| Catalog Number |
0118002 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
02/26/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ck parastomal patch on (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ck parastomal patch.It is alleged that the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2018.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention and "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient"; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jul-2010) is considered to be a best estimate.This supplemental emdr represents the bard/davol parastomal patch (device #1).Additional emdr was submitted to represent the bard/davol ventrio st(device #2) note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ck parastomal patch on (b)(6) 2012.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ck parastomal patch.It is alleged that the patient underwent revision surgery on (b)(6) 2018.Attorney alleges general allegations for ¿past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, mental and physical pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient." it is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2012 - patient was diagnosed with parastomal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of parastomal patch (device #1).Per operative notes, ¿multiple intra abdominal adhesions were taken down.The parastomal hernia was noted and repaired with parastomal patch (device #1) within the abdomen and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2013 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent incarcerated parastomal hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio st (device #2).Per operative notes, ¿the extensive intraabdominal adhesions were dissected.The parastomal hernia was noted around previously placed mesh (device #1).The hernia was repaired and placed with ventrio st (device #2) (b)(6) 2018 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent parastomal hernia and ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with removal of mesh.Per operative notes, ¿multiple ventral hernia were encountered and dense adhesions in the abdomen and mesh were removed.(device #1 and device #2).The parastomal hernia and ventral hernia were closed with sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2019 - patient was diagnosed with ventral hernia and incisional hernia and abdominal pain thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device #3) and phasix mesh (device #4).Per operative notes, ¿the large defect in the periumbilical area and several small defects were identified.The large bard flat mesh (device #3) was placed and secured with sutures.To the anterior fascia the phasix mesh (device #4) was placed and secured.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|