• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA 20; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ALTRUA 20; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number S208
Medical Device Problem Code Battery Problem (2885)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/24/2020
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, detailed mechanical and electrical testing was performed on the device.The device battery status was eol.The device functioned normally throughout testing.Laboratory analysis determined that this device experienced normal battery depletion; however, it was reported from the field that the estimated longevity remaining value appeared to decrease more quickly than expected between routine follow-ups.Factors influencing the estimated longevity remaining calculation include pacing rate, amplitude, pulse-width and lead impedance.Any (even slight) changes in these factors will impact the battery consumption calculation and therefore the remaining longevity estimate.Please note that, despite the drop in estimated longevity remaining, the actual battery condition did not change significantly between follow-ups.In summary, it was determined that this device experienced normal battery depletion, but declared eol earlier than previously estimated.Of note, the estimated remaining battery longevity of this pacemaker was designed to be calculated (and trigger corresponding device replacement indicators) based on the pacing capacitor charge time, which progressively increases as the battery depletes.These pacemakers were not designed with an ability to calculate remaining longevity for every possible current drain, which may cause replacement indicators to trigger earlier than what was previously estimated; however, it does not negatively impact the use, operation, safety, or performance of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker had a magnet rate of 90 from three months ago with less than 0.5 months battery remaining but not elective replacement indicator (eri).The device had reached end of life (eol) in less than a month ago.Subsequently, the device was explanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, detailed mechanical and electrical testing was performed on the device.The device battery status was eol.The device functioned normally throughout testing.Laboratory analysis determined that this device experienced normal battery depletion; however, it was reported from the field that the estimated longevity remaining value appeared to decrease more quickly than expected between routine follow-ups.Factors influencing the estimated longevity remaining calculation include pacing rate, amplitude, pulse-width and lead impedance.Any (even slight) changes in these factors will impact the battery consumption calculation and therefore the remaining longevity estimate.Please note that, despite the drop in estimated longevity remaining, the actual battery condition did not change significantly between follow-ups.In summary, it was determined that this device experienced normal battery depletion, but declared eol earlier than previously estimated.Of note, the estimated remaining battery longevity of this pacemaker was designed to be calculated (and trigger corresponding device replacement indicators) based on the pacing capacitor charge time, which progressively increases as the battery depletes.These pacemakers were not designed with an ability to calculate remaining longevity for every possible current drain, which may cause replacement indicators to trigger earlier than what was previously estimated; however, it does not negatively impact the use, operation, safety, or performance of the device.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that this pacemaker had a magnet rate of 90 from three months ago with less than 0.5 months battery remaining but not elective replacement indicator (eri).The device had reached end of life (eol) in less than a month ago.Subsequently, the device was explanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ALTRUA 20
Common Device Name
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key12113240
Report Number2124215-2021-13216
Device Sequence Number14309823
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526484421
UDI-Public00802526484421
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
N970003/S106
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Device Explanted Year2020
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/12/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date03/06/2011
Device Model NumberS208
Device Catalogue NumberS208
Device Lot Number591515
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/01/2020
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 04/30/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/20/2023
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/03/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/12/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured03/09/2009
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-