MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 VENTRALIGHT ST MESH; SURGICAL MESH

Catalog Number	5954113
Medical Device Problem Codes	Defective Device (2588); Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes	Adhesion(s) (1695); Pain (1994); Hernia (2240); Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event	06/08/2015
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-oct-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (catalog no, lot no, udi, expiry date), d.6b (date of explant), g3, g4, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.This supplemental emdr represents the ventralight st (device 1).Additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the ventrio st(device 2).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
Event or Problem Description
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for implant of an unspecified bard/davol ventralight st on (b)(6) 2014.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against the ventralight st.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2014 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of ventralight st (device 1).Per op notes, ¿the omentum and bowel adhesions were lysed.Two hernia defects were identified and reduced.A ventralight st (device 1) was placed and tacked using sutures.¿ (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated recurrent ventral hernia with pain thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with excision of ventralight st (device 1) and implant of ventrio st (device 2).Per op notes, ¿large amount of adhesions was lysed.Adhesiolysis and enterolysis were performed.The colon adherent to mesh was lysed.The prior mesh (device 1) was excised.Large hernia sacs were identified and excised.A ventrio st (device 2) was placed and sutured.¿ (b)(6) 2020 - patient was diagnosed with multiple recurrent incarcerated ventral hernia and small bowel obstruction thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventrio st (device 3).Per op notes, ¿large hernia sacs were identified and opened.The loops of small bowel were noted and released.The bowel was reduced.The sac was resected.The bowel adherent to abdominal wall was taken down.A ventrio st (device 3) was placed and tacked using optifix.¿.

• Brand Name: VENTRALIGHT ST MESH
• Common Device Name: SURGICAL MESH
• Manufacturer (Section D): DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick RI 02886
• Manufacturer (Section G): BARD SHANNON LIMITED 3005636544; san geronimo industrial park; lot #1, road #3, km 79.7; humacao PR 00791
• Manufacturer Contact: andrew topoulos ; 100 crossings blvd.; warwick, RI 02886 ; 4018258495
• MDR Report Key: 12116198
• Report Number: 1213643-2021-05598
• Device Sequence Number: 17042024
• Product Code: FTL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00801741031595
• UDI-Public: (01)00801741031595(17)151028(10)HUXJ0449
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: GA
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: K101851
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2014
• Device Explanted Year: 2015
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Other,Consumer
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Non-Healthcare Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 09/11/2025

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 10/28/2015
• Device Catalogue Number: 5954113
• Device Lot Number: HUXJ0449
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Type of Report(Section G): Initial
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 06/15/2021
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 08/21/2025
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 07/05/2021
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 09/11/2025
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 10/15/2013
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 56 YR
• Patient Sex: Female