|
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION OBTRYX II SYSTEM - CURVED; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE, RETR
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
M0068504110 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Erosion (1750); Pain (1994); Scar Tissue (2060); Prolapse (2475); Urinary Incontinence (4572); Insufficient Information (4580)
|
| Date of Event |
08/29/2018
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Date of event: date of event was approximated to (b)(6) 2018, implant date, as no event date was reported.This event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implant surgeon is: dr.(b)(6).(b)(4).The complaint device is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Note: this manufacturer report pertains to the first of two devices used on the same patient.It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an obtryx sling system was implanted into the patient during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient was implanted with advantage fit blue system.As reported by the patient's attorney, the patient has experienced an unknown injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block e1: this event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implant surgeon is: (b)(6) dr., d.O.(b)(6) hospital medical center block h6: patient codes e2006, e232402, e2330, e2006, and impact code f1905 capture the reportable events of erosion, extrusion, urinary incontinence, pain, and device revision or replacement.Conclusion code d17 is being used in lieu of an adequate conclusion code for device not returned.Block h10: the complaint device is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an obtryx sling system was implanted into the patient during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.As reported by the patient's attorney, the patient has experienced an unknown injury.Boston scientific corporation received additional information on january 12, 2022 as follows: on (b)(6) 2018, the patient presented with urinary incontinence, occasional muscle soreness in the vaginal area when sitting, and bladder pain.Upon examination, the physician found the right arm of the obtryx sling was exposed about one centimeter and was tender to palpation.The patient then underwent urodynamics testing on (b)(6) 2018.Findings were sensory urgency, stress incontinence, voiding dysfunction, mesh exposure, and bladder pain.Mesh erosion was noted at mid to distal urethra during a cystoscopy performed on (b)(6) 2019.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient was diagnosed with midline cystocele.After discussing treatment options, the physician referred the patient for surgical excision of the obtryx sling.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient was implanted with advantage fit blue system.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an obtryx sling system was implanted into the patient during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.As reported by the patient's attorney, the patient has experienced an unknown injury.Boston scientific corporation received additional information on january 12, 2022 as follows: on (b)(6) 2018, the patient underwent combined posterior/anterior repair and paravaginal defect repair, vaginal approach.Relevant medical history included central obesity, diabetes, and hysterectomy (b)(6) 2018).On (b)(6) 2018, the patient presented for a 2-month postoperative visit.She reported urinary incontinence (with laughing, coughing, sneezing, yelling, walking, etc.In the amount of drips to splashes), occasional muscle soreness in the vaginal area when sitting, and bladder pain.Upon examination, the physician found the right arm of the obtryx sling was exposed about one centimeter and was tender to palpation.The patient elected to start with topical estrogen cream for the mesh exposure and urodynamics/cystoscopy to eliminate mesh erosion into the urethra as a source of her incontinence and bladder pain.The assessment at this visit also noted a suspected diagnosis of bladder pain syndrome, which may be related to the lower urinary tract symptoms, for which the patient elected dietary and behavioral modifications.The patient then underwent urodynamics testing on (b)(6) 2018.Findings were sensory urgency, urethral sensitivity, unstable detrusor on fill, stress incontinence, and voiding dysfunction (interrupted flow and low normal flow).The assessment was noted as mixed incontinence, mesh exposure, and bladder pain.Mesh erosion was noted at mid to distal urethra during a cystoscopy performed on (b)(6) 2019.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient was diagnosed with midline cystocele.The patient was also advised that her pelvic pain stemmed from muscle spasms most likely due to contracture of mesh.After discussing treatment options, the physician referred the patient for surgical excision of the obtryx sling, urethrolysis, urethroplasty, vaginal urethropexy, anterior colporrhaphy, and possible placement of graft and cystourethroscopy.On (b)(6) 2019, the patient was implanted with advantage fit blue system.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block b5: correction to the supplement report in mdr in block b5.Block e1: this event was reported by the patient's legal representation.The implant surgeon is: dr.(b)(6).Block h6: patient codes e2006, e232402, e2330, e2006, and impact code f1905 capture the reportable events of erosion, extrusion, urinary incontinence, pain, and device revision or replacement.Conclusion code d17 is being used in lieu of an adequate conclusion code for device not returned.Block h10: the complaint device is not expected to be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|