• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Overheating of Device (1437); Battery Problem (2885); Insufficient Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Paralysis (1997); Burning Sensation (2146); Numbness (2415); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for non-malignant pain.It was reported that when the patient was implanted with the ins, the ins worked but the stimulation went down the right side but the left side was "damaged." patient said the therapy did not help and their ins burned their spine when they charged ins.The ins made things worse causing the patient to need physical therapy, then the patient felt the ins itself being moved causing it to feel very bad, now the patient's body felt numb.The patient said the stimulator was at the base of neck and it hit their vocal cords and when they talked the ins hit their clavicle bone when they talked, the ins also hit the back of the patient's head.The patient's feet felt numb and they were losing feeling in their feet and arms, the patient's entire body felt like it was sulfuric acid.The patient had not charged their ins in a long time and the patient was needing to get an mri done.Patient services (pss) agent was unable to walk patient through checking their mri eligibility with their equipment since the ins was not charged.The patient did not know where the charger was for it was at home somewhere and the last time they charged ins it was burning their spine (patient verified the ins was burning the spine and not the external equipment).The patient was redirected to their healthcare provider to further address the issue.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The patient called back to report they lost all their external equipment.They also received a letter regarding the event, and respo nded that they were currently in a "holding pattern" with their healthcare provider (hcp).They stated their legs and arms go numb when they are at a 90% angle, the implant is hitting the clavicle on the left side.They reported they were told to not charge the ins, and the issue has not been resolved as the hcp wants a manufacturer representative (rep) to get into contact with them.They stated they can feel the ins moving during the call.The patient's weight was unknown at the time as they were in the hospital.[see general text info for details on omitted information.].
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received.Patient called in to respond to follow up that was sent to them.Patient reported weight at time of event is unknown.Patient stated they are currently in a "holding pattern" with her hcp.Pt stated her legs and arms go numb when she is at a 90% angle.The implant is hitting the clavicle on the left side.Pt stated no one can find the right recharger for the ins to be put in to mri mode.Pt stated everyone has told pt to not charge the ins.Issue is not resolved.Patient can feel the ins moving while she is talking to pss today.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Continuation of d10: product id 97755 serial# unknown product type recharger.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient on (b)(6) 2022.Pt reported that their device never worked correctly and no physician could get their device to work correctly.Pt reported that the therapy never worked and "never functioned correctly and i was paralyzed during the surgery and i couldn't".No further information provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key12121994
MDR Text Key260054851
Report Number3004209178-2021-10413
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/14/2019
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/02/2021
Initial Date FDA Received07/06/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received07/13/2021
07/13/2021
10/04/2022
Supplement Dates FDA Received07/14/2021
07/14/2021
10/11/2022
Date Device Manufactured11/14/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H10...."; "SEE H10...."
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient SexFemale
-
-