| Model Number |
BA25-70/I16-30 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Failure of Implant (1924)
|
| Date of Event |
06/10/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device involved in this event will not be returned for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.Patient medical records and imaging studies will be requested for further evaluation by the clinical specialist.If additional information pertinent to the incident is obtained, a follow-up report will be submitted.Device iteration is afx with duraply.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent graft, a suprarenal aortic extension and two (2) iliac limb extensions to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).Approximately four (4) years post initial procedure, a computed tomography (ct) scan identified type 1b, 2, 3b endoleaks and that the left iliac limb extension had migrated proximally.The patient is currently being monitored while an intervention is being discussed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent graft, a suprarenal aortic extension and two (2) iliac limb extensions to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).Approximately four (4) years post initial procedure, a computed tomography (ct) scan identified type 1b, 2, 3b endoleaks and that the left iliac limb extension had migrated proximally.The patient is currently being monitored while an intervention is being discussed.Additional information: clinical evaluation shows that a re-intervention was completed.The patient was implanted with bilateral limbs stent and an extender (non-endolgoix stents).The patient status was reported being stable post the secondary endovascular procedure.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported adverse event/incident was investigated in alignment with endologix operating procedures and work instructions.Where possible, it is endologix practice to make at least three good faith efforts to retrieve a reported adverse event/incident related device as well as medical records and medical imaging.An evaluation of the manufacturing record was completed.A review of the part number/lot number combination needed for device identification shows the device to have been properly manufactured and released in accordance with the device master record a clinical evaluation of the adverse event/incident was completed.An examination of medical records and/or medical imaging received by endologix shows that the type 1b endoleak from the left common iliac artery was confirmed.The reported migration, and type 2 and 3b endoleaks were not confirmed.This is moderately consistent with the reported adverse event/incident.Procedure related harms, device, user, procedure or anatomy relatedness of this complaint could not be determined with the lack of medical records and/or imaging available for review.The final patient status was reported being stable post the secondary endovascular procedure.No additional investigation of this reported adverse event/incident is planned.However, should additional information relevant to the investigation outcome become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this and similar adverse events/incidents.Device iteration is afx with duraply.Corrections: b5: describe event or problem - updated.G4: date received by manufacturer - updated.H6: result code: remove code 3233.H6: conclusion code: remove code 11.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported adverse event/incident was investigated in alignment with endologix operating procedures and work instructions.Where possible, it is endologix practice to make at least three good faith efforts to retrieve a reported adverse event/incident related device as well as medical records and medical imaging.An evaluation of the manufacturing record was completed.A review of the part number/lot number combination needed for device identification shows the device to have been properly manufactured and released in accordance with the device master record a clinical evaluation of the adverse event/incident was completed.An examination of medical records and/or medical imaging received by endologix shows that the type 1b endoleak from the left common iliac artery was confirmed.The reported migration, and type 2 and 3a endoleaks were not confirmed.This is moderately consistent with the reported adverse event/incident.Procedure related harms, device, user, procedure or anatomy relatedness of this complaint could not be determined with the lack of medical records and/or imaging available for review.The final patient status was reported being stable post the secondary endovascular procedure.No additional investigation of this reported adverse event/incident is planned.However, should additional information relevant to the investigation outcome become available, a follow-up report will be submitted.Endologix will continue to monitor this and similar adverse events/incidents.Device iteration is afx with duraply corrections: b5: describe event or problem - correction g4: date received by manufacturer - updated h10: addtl mfg narrative - correction.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Correction: subsequent to the follow up report we identified an error in the event reported.The reported type 3b endoleak is a type 3a endoleak.The patient was initially implanted with a bifurcated stent graft, a suprarenal aortic extension and two (2) iliac limb extensions to treat an abdominal aortic aneurysm (aaa).Approximately four (4) years post initial procedure, a computed tomography (ct) scan identified type 1b, 2, 3a endoleaks and that the left iliac limb extension had migrated proximally.A re-intervention was completed.The patient was implanted with bilateral limbs stent and an extender (non-endolgoix stents).The patient status was reported being stable post the secondary endovascular procedure.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|