|
The initial reporter stated they received discrepant results for five patient samples tested with the elecsys pth immunoassay on a cobas 8000 e 801 module (serial number (b)(4)).No incorrect results were reported outside of the laboratory.The first patient sample initially resulted in a pth value of 12.1 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021, which repeated as 7.95 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The sample was repeated using an unknown chemiluminescence method, resulting in a value of 16 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The second patient sample initially resulted in a pth value of 11.2 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021, which repeated as 9.63 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The sample was repeated using an unknown chemiluminescence method, resulting in a value of 15.40 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The third patient sample initially resulted in a pth value of 4.65 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021, which repeated as 3.88 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The sample was repeated using an unknown chemiluminescence method, resulting in a value of 20.20 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The fourth patient sample initially resulted in a pth value of 4.59 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021, which repeated as 5.39 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The sample was repeated using an unknown chemiluminescence method, resulting in a value of 18.20 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The fifth patient sample initially resulted in a pth value of 6.81 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021, which repeated as 6.11 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.The sample was repeated using an unknown chemiluminescence method, resulting in a value of 20.80 pg/ml on (b)(6) 2021.
|