• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBYLP0105
Medical Device Problem Codes Break (1069); Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 06/08/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil lp pusher assembly revealed that the introducer sheath was fractured at its proximal end and the fractured proximal segment was not returned for evaluation.Based on the reported complaint, this damage was likely a result of the introducer sheath being cut during the procedure.Further evaluation of the device revealed that the pet lock was separated on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.If this occurs, the pull wire will retract from the pusher assembly distal detachment tip and the embolization coil will detach from the pusher assembly.The root cause of the separated pet lock could not be determined.The detached embolization coil was not returned for evaluation.Due to the returned condition, the root cause of the reported complaint could not be determined.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Conclusions code 1: (b)(4) - the investigation findings do not lead to a clear conclusion about the root cause of the reported complaint due to the return condition.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2021-01490, 3005168196-2021-01491.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a pseudoaneurysm using ruby coil lps and a microcatheter.During the procedure, three ruby coil lps would not advance at all past their initial positions within their introducer sheaths.Subsequently, the scrub technologist removed the ruby coil lps from the backside of the introducer sheaths, cut the friction locks, and backloaded the introducer sheaths.It was reported that, while attempting to remove one of the ruby coil lps from the backside of its introducer sheath, resistance was encountered, and the ruby coil lp detached from its pusher assembly on the back table.The physician then successfully placed the remaining two ruby coil lps in the target vessel.The procedure was completed using additional lp coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL LP
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key12133208
Report Number3005168196-2021-01489
Device Sequence Number11916064
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00815948021730
UDI-Public00815948021730
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateCA
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K192955
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 07/07/2021
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/11/2026
Device Model NumberRBYLP0105
Device Catalogue NumberRBYLP0105
Device Lot NumberF103228
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/11/2021
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/08/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/08/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-