|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.Not returned.
|
|
No conclusions can be made.The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient.The patient's attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention; however, no details have been provided.No lot number has been provided; therefore, a review of the manufacturing records is not possible.Addendum: this supplemental emdr is submitted to document additional information provided.Root cause is inconclusive, no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-sep-2009) is considered to be a best estimate.Updated fields: a2, b3, b4, b5, b7, d4 (product catalog no., corporate lot no., expiry date, udi no.), d6b (date of explant), g1, g3, g6, h2, h4, h6, h10.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
|
Attorney alleges that the patient underwent surgery for the implant of an unspecified bard/davol composix l/p on (b)(6) 2009.As reported, the patient is making a claim for an adverse patient outcome against composix l/p.Attorney alleges that the patient had subsequent surgical intervention due to the hernia mesh device.It is also alleged that the patient experienced emotional distress and the device was defective.Addendum per additional information provided: (b)(6) 2009 ¿ patient was diagnosed with reducible umbilical hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of composix lp mesh (device 1).Per operative notes, ¿ a symptomatic reducible umbilical hernia was reduced.The omentum adhered to hernia sac was lysed.The composix lp mesh (device 1) was placed over the anterior abdominal wall and tacked to the fascia.¿ (b)(6) 2011 ¿ patient was diagnosed with infected mesh and abscess thereby underwent open repair with removal of infected mesh.Per operative notes, ¿ the previous sinus tract was opened and enlarged abscess cavity was noted.The infected mesh (device 1) with abscess cavity was removed and wound was irrigated and wound vac was placed.¿ (b)(6) 2012 - patient was diagnosed with recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of bard flat mesh (device 2) mesh.Per operative notes, ¿ to the old incision, a large residual hernia was noted and reduced.Adhesions and scar tissues were taken down and fascia was closed with sutures.A bard flat mesh (device 2) was placed over the wound and secured with sutures and staples.¿.
|