MAUDE Adverse Event Report: WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC UNK - CONSTRUCTS: SYNAPSE; ORTHOSIS, CERVICAL PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL FIXATION

Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)

Patient Problem Intervertebral Disc Compression or Protrusion (4524)

Event Type  Injury  

Manufacturer Narrative

This report is for an unk - constructs: synapse/unknown lot.Part and lot numbers are unknown; udi number is unknown.Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Reporter is a j&j employee.Without a lot number the device history records review could not be completed.Product was not returned.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.

Event Description

This report is being filed after the review of a clinical evaluation report (cer) from a related research activity database (ddra) for patients undergoing cervical fusion.The following complications were reported as follows: readmission: neoplasm, benign, nos (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-t2 decompression for tumor resection and fusion with synapse instrumentation readmitted for neoplasm, benign, nos.Neoplasm, metastatic, brain/spinal cord (1) patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervicothoracic decompression fusion was readmitted for neoplasm, metastatic, brain/spinal cord.Stenosis, cervical spine (3) patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent anterior c5-c6, c6-7 discectomy and fusion with allograft and aviator plate was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine.Patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent anterior c5-6, c6-7 discectomy and fusion with allograft and aviator plate was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine.Patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent anterior/posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine.Stenosis, cervicothoracic spine (1) patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent anterior l3-s1 decompression fusion with vertigraft, possible infuse was readmitted due to stenosis, cervicothoracic spine.Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region (2) patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical c5-6 decompression and fusion with synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region.Patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region.Other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region (4) patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent revision anterior c7 corpectomy was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical c2-7 decompression was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent anterior c5-6, c6-7 decompression fusion with vg2 and maxan plate/posterior c2-t2 decompression fusion with synapse 4.0 instrumentation(new aesculap retractor) was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression f was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region (3) patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-7 decompression fusion with allograft/posterior c3-t1 fusion with synapse was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-7 decompression fusion with allograft/posterior c3-t1 fusion with synapse was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior/posterior cervical decompression and fusion was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic region (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical fusion c3-t2 was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic region.Radiculopathy, cervical region (1) patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c4-t1 decompression was readmitted due to radiculopathy, cervical region.Other cord compression (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c2-6 decompression and fusion with synapse 4.0 instrumentation was readmitted due to other cord compression.Myelopathy, nec (1) patient (b)(6) male ,(b)(6) who underwent anterior/posterior cervical corpectomy and fusion; i and d; graft placement was readmitted due to myelopathy, nec.Connective tissue and disc stenosis of intervertebral forami (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical decompression was readmitted due to connective tissue and disc stenosis of intervertebral forami.Other cervical disc displacement (1) patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to other cervical disc displacement.Kyphosis, unspecified, cervical region (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c2-4 fusison with 3.5 synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to kyphosis, unspecified, cervical region.Postural kyphosis, cervicothoracic region (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to postural kyphosis, cervicothoracic region.Other postoperative infection (3) patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression, c3-t2 fusion with syynpase 4.0 instrumentation was readmitted due to other postoperative infection.Patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c5-6 6-7 decompression and fusion with synthes synapse and small infuse kit was readmitted due to other postoperative infection.Patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent c3-7 laminectomy , c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to other postoperative infection.Infection following a procedure, initial encounter (2) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to infection following a procedure, initial encounter.Patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent minimally invasive posterior c was readmitted due to infection following a procedure, initial encounter.Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation (1) patient (b)(6).Female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c2-t1 fusion with sy was readmitted due to infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation.Pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis (5) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c1-2 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent image guided revision posterior was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent revision posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent revision posterior c2-7 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Displacement of other internal orthopedic devices, implants (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior posterior cervical th rod spinal 80mm 3.5mm axon cur readmitted due to displacement of other internal orthopedic devices, implants.Other mechanical complication of other internal orthopedic device (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-6 decompression fu was readmitted due to other mechanical complication of other internal orthopedic device.Complication nec due to other internal orthopedic device (1) patient (b)(6) female ,(b)(6) who underwent anterior cervical c4-6 corpectomy with fibula allograft, posterior c3-t1 laminectomy and fusion with synapse 4.0 instrumentation was readmitted due to complication nec due to other internal orthopedic device mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nec (1) patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) ,who underwent removal of anterior bilateral was readmitted due to mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nec mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nos (1) patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression, c3-t1 fusion with synapse 3.5 instrument (latex allergy) was readmitted due to mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nos.Neuralgia/neuritis, nos (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to neuralgia/neuritis, nos.Spondylolisthesis, acquired (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression, c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to spondylolisthesis, acquired.Non-healing surgical wound (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-4, c4-5, c6-7 decompression and fusion with allograft, (no plate), posterior c3-7 laminectomy, c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse 4.0 instrumentation was readmitted due to non-healing surgical wound.Disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified (1) patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent occiput to c2 decompression and fusion was readmitted due to disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified.Nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage (1) patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage.Fx closed c3 vertebra (2) patient (b)(6) male ,(b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-4, c4-5, c5-6, c6-7 decompression and fusion with allograft (no plate), posterior c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse 4.0 was readmitted due to fx closed c3 vertebra.Patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent revision a/p cervical decompression/fusion was readmitted due to fx closed c3 vertebra.Fx closed c2 vertebra (1) patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c5-t1 decompression fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to fx closed c2 vertebra.Other fracture of first thoracic vertebra (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior/ posterior c4-7 dec was readmitted due to other fracture of first thoracic vertebra.Unstable burst fracture of first thoracic vertebra (1) patient (b)(6) male, (b)(6) who underwent panendoscopy with poss neck exploration was readmitted due to unstable burst fracture of first thoracic vertebra.Removal of clik-x instrumentation (1) patient (b)(6) male had removal of l4-s1 clik-x instrumentation.The following patient had removal of synapse system implants (6) patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) underwent posterior removal of synapse rods revision of t1 screws, placement of t2-t4 screws/anterior c6-7, c7-t1 fusion with allograft /posterior implantation of synapse rods patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) underwent posterior removal of synapse rods, revision of fusion to t4/anterior c7-t1 corpectomy fusion with tricortical allograft.Readmitted for myelopathy nec.Patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) underwent revision anterior/posterior decompression and fusion , removal of cslp plate and synapse instrumenatation , reinstrumentation with atlantis and mountaineer vs.Cslp and synapse.Patient (b)(6) female , (b)(6) who underwent posterior c1-2 fusion with mountaineer , removal of synthes instrumentation.Patient (b)(6) female, revision of occiput-c4 fusion with revision of synthes synapse.Patient (b)(6) female, removal of synapse c4-t1 rods.The following had removal of cervifix implants (3) patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) underwent revision posterior c2-t2 fusion with synapse instrumentation and autograft (remove cervifix) patient (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent revison anterior c5-6 decompression fusion with allograft and vectra plate (remove synthes cslp) , posterior revision c2-t1 with synapse instrumenataton (remove cervifix)s.Patient (b)(6) female, (b)(6), who underwent cervical decompression and fusion (no plate) , revision posterior cervical fusion with synthes synapse, removal of synthes cervifix screws the following had removal of cslp patient (b)(6) female (b)(6) had removal anterior c3-7 cslp plate.This is for depuy synthes posterior cervical systems (synapse).A copy of the clinical evaluation form is being submitted with this regulatory report.This report is for one (1) unk - constructs: synapse.This is report 1 of 20 for complaint (b)(4).

• Brand Name: UNK - CONSTRUCTS: SYNAPSE
• Type of Device: ORTHOSIS, CERVICAL PEDICLE SCREW SPINAL FIXATION
• Manufacturer (Section D): WRIGHTS LANE SYNTHES USA PRODUCTS LLC; 1302 wrights lane east; west chester PA 19380
• Manufacturer Contact: kara ditty-bovard ; 1302 wright lane east; west chester, PA 19380 ; 6107195000
• MDR Report Key: 12135450
• MDR Text Key: 273085196
• Report Number: 2939274-2021-03511
• Device Sequence Number: 1
• Product Code: NKB
• Combination Product (y/n): N
• Reporter Country Code: US
• Number of Events Reported: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Report Source: Manufacturer
• Reporter Occupation: Other Health Care Professional
• Type of Report: Initial
• Report Date: 06/14/2021

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Date FDA Received: 07/08/2021
• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Device Operator: Health Professional
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Date Manufacturer Received: 06/14/2021
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer?: Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Type of Device Usage: Unknown
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Outcome(s): Required Intervention