This report is being filed after the review of a clinical evaluation report (cer) from a related research activity database (ddra) for patients undergoing cervical fusion.The following complications were reported: readmission: neoplasm, benign, nos (1): patient no.(b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-t2 decompression for tumor resection and fusion with synapse instrumentation readmitted for neoplasm, benign, nos.Neoplasm, metastatic, brain/spinal cord (1): patient no.(b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervicothoracic decompression fusion was readmitted for neoplasm, metastatic, brain/spinal cord.Stenosis, cervical spine (3): patient (no.(b)(6))female (b)(6) who underwent anterior c5-c6, c6-7 discectomy and fusion with allograft and aviator plate was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine.Patient (no (b)(6)) female (b)(6) who underwent anterior c5-6, c6-7 discectomy and fusion with allograft and aviator plate was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine.Patient (no.(b)(6)) female (b)(6) who underwent anterior/posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to stenosis, cervical spine.Stenosis, cervicothoracic spine (1): patient (no.(b)(6)) female (b)(6) who underwent anterior l3-s1 decompression fusion with vertigraft, possible infuse was readmitted due to stenosis, cervicothoracic spine.Spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region (2): patient (no.(b)(6)) female (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical c5-6 decompression and fusion with synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region.Patient no.(b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to spondylosis without myelopathy or radiculopathy, cervical region.Another spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region (4): patient no (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent revision anterior c7 corpectomy was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient no (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical c2-7 decompression was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient (no.(b)(6)) male (b)(6) who underwent anterior c5-6, c6-7 decompression fusion with vg2 and maxan plate/posterior c2-t2 decompression fusion with synapse 4.0 instrumentation(new aesculap retractor) was readmitted due to another spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient no (b)(6) female (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression f was readmitted due to other spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region (3): -patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-7 decompression fusion with allograft/posterior c3-t1 fusion with synapse was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-7 decompression fusion with allograft/posterior c3-t1 fusion with synapse was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior/posterior cervical decompression and fusion was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, cervical region.Spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic region (1) patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical fusion c3-t2 was readmitted due to spondylosis with myelopathy, thoracic region.Radiculopathy, cervical region (1): patient no (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c4-t1 decompression was readmitted due to radiculopathy, cervical region.Other cord compression (1): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c2-6 decompression and fusion with synapse 4.0 instrumentation was readmitted due to other cord compression.Myelopathy, nec (1): patient no (b)(6), male , (b)(6)who underwent anterior/posterior cervical corpectomy and fusion; i and d; graft placement was readmitted due to myelopathy, nec.Connective tissue and disc stenosis of intervertebral forami (1): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical decompression was readmitted due to connective tissue and disc stenosis of intervertebral forami.Another cervical disc displacement (1): patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to other cervical disc displacement.Kyphosis, unspecified, cervical region (1): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c2-4 fusion with 3.5 synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to kyphosis, unspecified, cervical region.Postural kyphosis, cervicothoracic region (1): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to postural kyphosis, cervicothoracic region.Other postoperative infection (3): patient no (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression, c3-t2 fusion with synapse 4.0 instrumentation was readmitted due to other postoperative infection.Patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c5-6 6-7 decompression and fusion with synthes synapse and small infuse kit was readmitted due to other postoperative infection.Patient no.(b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent c3-7 laminectomy , c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to other postoperative infection.Infection following a procedure, initial encounter (2): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to infection following a procedure, initial encounter.Patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent minimally invasive posterior c was readmitted due to infection following a procedure, initial encounter.Infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation (1): patient no (b)(6).Female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c2-t1 fusion with sy was readmitted due to infection and inflammatory reaction due to internal fixation.Pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis (5): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c1-2 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent image guided revision posterior was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Patient no (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent revision posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent revision posterior c2-7 decompression was readmitted due to pseudarthrosis after fusion or arthrodesis.Displacement of other internal orthopedic devices, implants (1): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior posterior cervical th rod spinal 80mm 3.5mm axon cur readmitted due to displacement of other internal orthopedic devices, implants.Other mechanical complication of another internal orthopedic device (1): patient no.(b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-6 decompression fu was readmitted due to other mechanical complication of another internal orthopedic device.Complication nec due to another internal orthopedic device (1): patient no.(b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent anterior cervical c4-6 corpectomy with fibula allograft, posterior c3-t1 laminectomy and fusion with synapse 4.0 instrumentation was readmitted due to complication nec due to another internal orthopedic device.Mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nec (1): patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6), who underwent removal of anterior bilateral was readmitted due to mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nec.Mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nos (1): patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression, c3-t1 fusion with synapse 3.5 instrument (latex allergy) was readmitted due to mechanical complication internal orthopedic device/implant/graft, nos.Neuralgia/neuritis, nos (1): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior cervical fusion was readmitted due to neuralgia/neuritis, nos.Spondylolisthesis, acquired (1): patient no.(b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-7 decompression, c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to spondylolisthesis, acquired.Non-healing surgical wound (1): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-4, c4-5, c6-7 decompression and fusion with allograft, (no plate), posterior c3-7 laminectomy, c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse 4.0 instrumentation was readmitted due to non-healing surgical wound.Disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified (1): patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent occiput to c2 decompression and fusion was readmitted due to disruption of external operation (surgical) wound, not elsewhere classified.Nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage (1): patient no (b)(6) male (b)(6) who underwent posterior c3-t1 decompression was readmitted due to nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage.Fx closed c3 vertebra (2): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior c3-4, c4-5, c5-6, c6-7 decompression, and fusion with allograft (no plate), posterior c3-t1 fusion with synthes synapse 4.0 was readmitted due to fx closed c3 vertebra.Patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent revision a/p cervical decompression/fusion was readmitted due to fx closed c3 vertebra.Fx closed c2 vertebra (1): patient no (b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c5-t1 decompression fusion with synthes synapse instrumentation was readmitted due to fx closed c2 vertebra.Other fracture of first thoracic vertebra (1): patient no (b)(6),male, (b)(6) who underwent anterior/ posterior c4-7 dec was readmitted due to other fracture of first thoracic vertebra.Unstable burst fracture of first thoracic vertebra (1): patient no (b)(6), male, (b)(6) who underwent pan endoscopy with poss neck exploration was readmitted due to unstable burst fracture of first thoracic vertebra.Removal of clik-x instrumentation (1): patient no.(b)(6) male had removal of l4-s1 clik-x instrumentation.The following patient had removal of synapse system implants (6): patient no.(b)(6) male (b)(6) underwent posterior removal of synapse rods revision of t1 screws, placement of t2-t4 screws/anterior c6-7, c7-t1 fusion with allograft /posterior implantation of synapse rods.Patient no.(b)(6) male (b)(6) underwent posterior removal of synapse rods, revision of fusion to t4/anterior c7-t1 corpectomy fusion with tricortical allograft.Readmitted for myelopathy nec.Patient no.(b)(6) female (b)(6) underwent revision anterior/posterior decompression and fusion , removal of cslp plate and synapse instrumentation, reinstrumentation with atlantis and mountaineer vs.Cslp and synapse.Patient no.(b)(6), female, (b)(6) who underwent posterior c1-2 fusion with mountaineer , removal of synthes instrumentation.Patient no.(b)(6) female, revision of occiput-c4 fusion with revision of synthes synapse.Patient no.(b)(6) female, removal of synapse c4-t1 rods.The following had removal of cervi fix implants (3): patient no.(b)(6) male (b)(6) underwent revision posterior c2-t2 fusion with synapse instrumentation and autograft (remove cervi fix).Patient no.(b)(6), male (b)(6) who underwent revision anterior c5-6 decompression fusion with allograft and vectra plate (remove synthes cslp) , posterior revision c2-t1 with synapse instrumentation (remove cervi fix)s.Patient no.(b)(6), female, (b)(6), who underwent cervical decompression and fusion (no plate) , revision posterior cervical fusion with synthes synapse, removal of synthes cervi fix screws.The following had removal of cslp (3 refer to pt (b)(6) and (b)(6)): patient no.(b)(6) female (b)(6) had removal anterior c3-7 cslp plate.This is for depuy synthes posterior cervical systems (synapse).This report is for (1)unk - locking/set screws: synapse.This report is 11 of 20 for (b)(4).The complaint involves 208 devices.Due to a limit of impacted products per complaint, this complaint will be captured under 11 separate complaints as listed below: (b)(4) - this complaint will include 19 ips (1st pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 19 ips (2nd pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 20 ips (3rd pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 11 ips (4th pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 20 ips (5th pc).(b)(4)- this complaint will include 20 ips (6th pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 20 ips (7th pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 20 ips (8th pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 20 ips (9th pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 20 ips (10th pc).(b)(4) - this complaint will include 19 ips (11th pc).For the overall complaint, adverse event review activity, mdv activity, will be documented in (b)(4) (1st pc).
|