Model Number 1012455-15 |
Device Problems
Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Separation (1562); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Failure to Deflate (4060)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 06/18/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for investigation.It has not yet been received.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat the mid and proximal right coronary arteries with severe calcification.The 5.00x15 mm nc trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) had a contrast mix of 50/50 and was inflated twice to 20 atmospheres (atm).The balloon was repositioned in the artery between inflations and there was no issue deflating the balloon after the first inflation.After the second inflation, the trek balloon would not deflate at all despite multiple attempts.Negative pressure was applied for 20-30 seconds.A syringe was also used in an attempt to deflate the balloon before it was removed.The balloon was pulled a few times and the entire system was removed (bdc, guide wire).As the balloon was stuck with the guide wire, wire access was lost.The balloon separated at the proximal balloon marker and remained in the patient.Instead of attempting to snare, another guide wire was placed sub-intimally and the balloon was crushed to the vessel wall with 4.00x38 and 4.00x15 mm xience stents.Post-dilatation was performed with another 5.00x15 mm nc trek bdc.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat the mid and proximal right coronary arteries with severe calcification.The 5.00x15 mm nc trek balloon dilatation catheter (bdc) had a contrast mix of 50/50 and was inflated twice to 20 atmospheres (atm).The balloon was repositioned in the artery between inflations and there was no issue deflating the balloon after the first inflation.After the second inflation, the trek balloon would not deflate at all despite multiple attempts.Negative pressure was applied for 20-30 seconds.A syringe was also used in an attempt to deflate the balloon before it was removed.The balloon was pulled a few times and the entire system was removed (bdc, guide wire).As the balloon was stuck with the guide wire, wire access was lost.The balloon separated at the proximal balloon marker and remained in the patient.Instead of attempting to snare, another guide wire was placed sub-intimally and the balloon was crushed to the vessel wall with 4.00x38 and 4.00x15 mm xience stents.Post-dilatation was performed with another 5.00x15 mm nc trek bdc.Subsequently to the initially filed report, the following information was provided: the access was via the radial artery.The nc trek bdc was stuck with the anatomy.The pilot guide wire was used to go sub-intimal in the second portion of the procedure.The 1st xience stent used to crush the balloon was 4.00x30 mm.Post dilatation with the 5.00x15 mm nc trek was performed at 24 atm.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Visual inspection was performed on the returned device.The reported separation was confirmed.The reported deflation issue could not be replicated in a testing environment due to the condition of the returned device.The reported difficulty removing the device could not be replicated in a testing environment as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.It was reported by the account that the balloon was inflated twice to 20 atmospheres (atms).It should be noted the coronary dilatation catheters (cdc), nc trek rx, global, instruction for use (ifu) states: balloon pressure should not exceed the rated burst pressure (rbp).The rbp for the nc trek rx device is 18 atm; therefore, rbp was exceeded.In this case, it is unknown if the reported ifu violation caused or contributed to the reported complaint.The investigation was unable to determine a conclusive cause for the reported failure to deflate; however, the reported difficulty removing the device, balloon separation, device embedded in tissue or plaque and additional treatment appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respects to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|