|
|
| Model Number |
RBYPCLP15 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Advance (2524)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
06/15/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Evaluation of the returned packing coil lp revealed that the pusher assembly was kinked and fractured.This type of damage typically occurs due to manipulation against resistance.Based on the reported complaint, the packing coil lp would not advance past the friction lock.This may have contributed to the resistance during the attempt to advance pusher assembly through its introducer sheath.Further evaluation revealed that the embolization coil was detached and had offset coil winds, and the introducer sheath was off the pusher assembly.This damage was incidental to the reported complaint.The detached embolization coil likely occurred due to the fractured pusher assembly.The offset coil winds likely occurred during packaging of the device for return.The root cause of the introducer sheath being off the pusher assembly could not be determined.Due to the returned damage, the root cause of the reported complaint could not be determined.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a type ii endoleak using packing coil lps, penumbra smart coils, a non-penumbra coil and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician placed several smart coils, packing coil lps and non-penumbra coils in the target location using the microcatheter.While attempting to place another packing coil lp in the target vessel, the hospital technician was unable to advance the packing coil lp past the friction lock.The physician also tried advancing the same packing coil lp; however, it would not advance at all past its initial position.Therefore, it was removed.The procedure was completed using a new packing coil lp, additional lp coils and non-penumbra coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|