The plant investigation is in process.
A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.
Clinical investigation: a temporal relationship exists between hd therapy utilizing the fresenius optiflux 160nre dialyzer, and the serious adverse events of pain and chronic rash (exacerbated by hd therapy).
The definitive etiology of the events is unknown; therefore, causality cannot be firmly established.
However, follow-up with the cm revealed the patient had a favorable response to an alternative dialyzer (nipro cellentia 17h), with a substitute mode of sterilization.
The cm reported the patient underwent hd without a return or worsening of the patient¿s rash or pain.
Limited information precluded a more comprehensive investigation.
Based on the totality of the information available, the fresenius optiflux 160nre dialyzer cannot be excluded from having a possible causal and/or contributory role in the patient¿s serious adverse events.
While uncommon, hypersensitivity reactions are known to occur with the use of optiflux dialyzers and/or other elements in the extracorporeal circuit.
Additionally, hypersensitivity reactions have been known to occur days, months, even years after use with the same dialyzer model.
|
It was reported to fresenius that a patient with end stage renal disease (esrd) on hemodialysis (hd) for renal replacement therapy (rrt) was experiencing a chronic rash, which worsened while undergoing hd therapy utilizing an optiflux 160nre dialyzer (specifics not provided).
Follow-up with the outpatient clinical manager (cm) revealed a substitute dialyzer (nipro cellentia 17h) was utilized on (b)(6) 2021 with favorable results.
The patient reportedly completed treatment without any complaints of pain or rash.
Subsequent attempts to obtain additional information (e.
G.
, patient demographics, treatment records, medical records, current disposition) have thus far proven unsuccessful.
|