• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. FMP HIP; FMP HEMISPHERICAL SHELLS W/SCREW HOLES, 52MM, W/P2 COATING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. FMP HIP; FMP HEMISPHERICAL SHELLS W/SCREW HOLES, 52MM, W/P2 COATING Back to Search Results
Model Number 430-98-052
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 06/30/2021
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
 
Event or Problem Description
Revision surgery - constrained liner failed due to retroverted cup.Surgeon pulled cup, and a styker cup and liner were implanted.A new djo head was used as well.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The reason for this revision surgery was reported as failed constrained liner.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 18 days apart.The healthcare professional indicated there was a serious risk to the patient.There was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements and showed no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the main contributor component listed in the complaint.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to failed constrained liner.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding pre-existing conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.Due to short time between previous and revision surgery, it is possible that the event may have occurred due to lack of post-operative care, patient noncompliance with medical instructions or incorrect implant selection, patient activities or trauma.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document as soon as it becomes available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: see d.10.Manufacturer narrative: additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was reported as failed constrained liner.The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 18 days apart.The in vivo time for the locking ring is 18 days from the previous revision surgery.The main item in vivo time is 37 days from the primary surgery and remainder of the items is 33 days from a more previous revision surgery.The healthcare professional indicated there was a serious risk to the patient.There was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The devices were disposed of at hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements and showed no non-conforming material reports (ncmr) associated with the main contributor component listed in the complaint.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported devices showed no present trends or on-going issues that are needing a review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to failed constrained liner.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate the reported devices were defective.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding preexisting conditions of the patient or any activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.Due to short time between previous and revision surgery, it is possible that the event may have occurred due to lack of post-operative care, patient noncompliance with medical instructions or incorrect implant selection, patient activities or trauma.There are multiple factors that may also contribute to an event that are outside the control of djo surgical.There are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.Additional reporting on this event will be provided as a supplemental report to this document if it becomes available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
FMP HIP
Common Device Name
FMP HEMISPHERICAL SHELLS W/SCREW HOLES, 52MM, W/P2 COATING
Manufacturer (Section D)
ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.
9800 metric blvd
austin, tx 78758-5445
MDR Report Key12170146
Report Number1644408-2021-00713
Device Sequence Number11170783
Product Code LPH
UDI-Device Identifier00888912084024
UDI-Public(01)00888912084024
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K974093
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Device Explanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 10/13/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/13/2025
Device Model Number430-98-052
Device Catalogue Number430-98-052
Device Lot Number587G1482
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 06/30/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer07/14/2021
09/28/2021
10/06/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/14/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date07/22/2021
09/29/2021
10/13/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
436-28-000 LOT 496C1091.; 436-28-000 LOT 496C1095.; 436-28-000 LOT 496C1095.; 436-28-007 LOT 499C1008.; 436-28-007 LOT 499C1008.; 436-28-007 LOT 499C1008.; 497-28-105 LOT 632C1170.; 497-28-105 LOT 632C1170.; 497-28-105 LOT 632C1170.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-