|
|
| Model Number |
SMXP140RH |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Material Rupture (1546)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Deformity/ Disfigurement (2360)
|
| Date of Event |
06/21/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Since the device has not been returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted, and no determination of possible contributing factors can be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.If the complaint device is received in the future, the investigation will be reopened and conducted as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation (mre) was performed, and no anomalies were found related to this complaint.In addition, the mre verifies that the device was manufactured in accordance with documented specification and procedures.Reason for device explant and/or reoperation: deflation.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a (b)(6) year-old caucasian female patient who underwent an unspecified breast surgery with 600cc artoura breast tissue expander experienced right-sided expander deflation postoperatively.As a result, the patient underwent explantation and replacement with an unspecified breast implant on (b)(6) 2021.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On july 16, 2021, the mentor failure analysis lab received the device for evaluation.The analysis has begun, but is not complete at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
On august 3, 2021, device evaluation was completed.Device evaluation summary: that investigation included a review of the manufacturing records for lot-9413922, and a visual evaluation of the device.During the visual evaluation of the tissue expander, the tear was not identified.As a result, leak testing was performed in accordance with mentor procedures, and a tear was identified at the 6 o¿clock position.When evaluated under a microscope, the tear pattern did not reveal parallel striations that are consistent with markings made by a sharp instrument.The results also confirmed that there were no abnormalities with the manufacturing of the tissue expander that would have impacted its performance.Therefore, we were unable to identify the root cause of this tear.Mentor adheres to the highest standards of quality.Our quality assurance process is robust for every product we make and requires that each mentor product undergoes a stringent visual inspection and rigorous testing prior to shipment.In addition, mentor maintains a comprehensive quality assurance system that complies with the food and drug administration's (fda) good manufacturing practice regulations.Prior to shipping, our devices are checked to ensure that they satisfy these standards in accordance with these processes.Potential cause: while deflation is historically the most common complication related to tissue expanders, the rate of deflation with mentor® tissue expanders remains very low.An incident of this nature may be the result of one or more of the following factors: over-inflation of the tissue expander, use of the tissue expander in emerging surgical techniques not identified in the instructions for use (ifu), continuous and sustained stresses to the tissue expander, vigorous body movement (e.G., physical exercise) or excessive manipulation/ trauma in the region of the expander.Mentor is committed to delivering high-quality tissue expanders and an exceptional customer experience.Manufacturer¿s reference number: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|