• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE DISTAL FEMUR JTS - TIBIAL COMPONENT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE DISTAL FEMUR JTS - TIBIAL COMPONENT; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_STM
Device Problems Loss of Osseointegration (2408); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Inadequate Osseointegration (2646); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/23/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.Should additional information become available, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation review of the device history records indicate devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.There have been no other similar events for the lot referenced.
 
Event Description
It has been reported "the patient has aseptic loosening of the tibial component, the tibial component is sinking".
 
Event Description
It has been reported "the patient has aseptic loosening of the tibial component, the tibial component is sinking".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding loosening involving a jts, distal femur was reported.The event was confirmed by x ray review.Method & results: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the implant in situ was for jts distal femoral replacement which was inserted on (b)(6) 2014.The surgeon reported tibial piece has sunken.The x-ray images provided show the tibial stem is tilted laterally, and there is larger knee gap between the tibial implant and tibial plateau on the medial side than on the lateral side, but the tibial profile is intact.I think the reason for this to happen is because the epiphyseal plate didn¿t grow evenly (medial side has grown much slower than the lateral side), which lead to uneven of the tibial plateau and tilt of the implant.The tibial stem is loose inside the canal due to growth of the patient.The radiographic review can confirm the reason for revision device history review: review of the product history records indicate the device was manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events for the lot referenced conclusion: on 06oct2021 a discussion was held with a clinical consultant regarding the investigation x ray review, the following was concluded: [.] the loosening and subsidence is likely attributed to bone growth, the reported loosening can be a result of bone growth, which causes the bone canal to increase in size the reported tibial subsidence is associated to the reported loosening, as the bone grows the tibial stem will loosen in situ and shift in position".However, the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, progress notes, and additional x ray images (post implantation) are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding patient factors / loosening involving a jts, distal femur was reported.The event was confirmed by x ray review.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection: visual inspection of the returned parts shows the distal femoral replacement.Other images showing the product marks are matching to the complaint record.Also, other marks and scratches are noticeable on the part.Additional devices were returned (axle and circlip), visual inspection confirms black bearing marks on the axle and scratches on both parts, however there is no allegation against them in the complaint.Clinician review: a review of the provided x-rays by a clinical consultant indicated: the implant in situ was for jts distal femoral replacement which was inserted on (b)(6) 2014.The surgeon reported tibial piece has sunken.The x-ray images provided show the tibial stem is tilted laterally, and there is larger knee gap between the tibial implant and tibial plateau on the medial side than on the lateral side, but the tibial profile is intact.I think the reason for this to happen is because the epiphyseal plate didn¿t grow evenly (medial side has grown much slower than the lateral side), which lead to uneven of the tibial plateau and tilt of the implant.The tibial stem is loose inside the canal due to growth of the patient.The radiographic review can confirm the reason for revision device history review: review of the product history records indicate the device was manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other events for the lot referenced.On (b)(6) 2021 a discussion was held with a clinical consultant regarding the investigation x ray review, the following was concluded: [.] the loosening and subsidence is likely attributed to bone growth, the reported loosening can be a result of bone growth, which causes the bone canal to increase in size.The reported tibial subsidence is associated to the reported loosening, as the bone grows the tibial stem will loosen in situ and shift in position".However, the exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, progress notes, and additional x ray images (post implantation) are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.
 
Event Description
It has been reported "the patient has aseptic loosening of the tibial component, the tibial component is sinking".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DISTAL FEMUR JTS - TIBIAL COMPONENT
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood WD6 3 SJ
UK  WD6 3SJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
STANMORE IMPLANTS WORLDWIDE
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood WD6 3 SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
Manufacturer Contact
diana rogers
210 centennial avenue
centennial park, elstree
borehamwood WD6 3-SJ
UK   WD6 3SJ
2082386500
MDR Report Key12171721
MDR Text Key261641557
Report Number3004105610-2021-00110
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K133152
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/16/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/30/2015
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_STM
Device Lot NumberPIN 18463
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 06/23/2021
Initial Date FDA Received07/15/2021
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received11/26/2021
02/15/2023
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/02/2021
02/16/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/10/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age18 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-