H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a broken powerglide was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 20ga x 10cm powerglide pro midline catheter assembly.The sample was received fully disassembled.Usage residues were observed throughout the sample.The catheter was received in two segments which shared a complete break 4.5cm from the molded joint.Microscopic inspection of the break revealed a partially granular and partially glossy fracture surface.The break profile was tapered.A longitudinally aligned scoring mark was observed on the inside surface of the catheter leading into the break site.The break features were consistent with catheter damage caused either by withdrawal of the catheter or insertion of the needle following catheter advancement.The blood residues present on the device suggested that damage occurred during attempted device placement.The product ifu states ¿warning: once the catheter has been advanced, do not re-insert the needle back into the catheter or pull the catheter back onto the needle.If the catheter needs to be repositioned, either do so without the aid of the needle, or remove both the catheter and the needle as a unit to prevent the needle from damaging or shearing the catheter.
|