• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CORDIS CORPORATION TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI; FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 466P306AU
Device Problem Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problem Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
Event Date 05/03/2021
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
It was reported that a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The information provided indicated that the filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused tilting of the filter.The indication for the filter implant has not been provided and there is currently no additional information available for review.The product was not returned for analysis and the sterile lot number has not been provided; therefore, no device analysis nor device history record review could be performed.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the vena cava for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pulmonary embolism where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pulmonary embolism where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with practitioner technique and/or vessel anatomy, specifically asymmetry and tortuosity.Without imaging available for review the event could not be confirmed nor a cause attributed.Given the limited information available for review at this time, there is nothing to suggest that the reported events are related to the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
As reported by the legal brief, a patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The filter subsequently malfunctioned and caused injury and damage to the patient, including, but not limited to tilting of the filter.As a direct and proximate result, the patient suffered life-threatening injuries and damages and required extensive medical care and treatment.As a further proximate result, the patient has suffered and will suffer significant medical expenses, pain and suffering and other damages.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
As reported, the patient underwent placement of a trapease vena cava filter.The patient is reported to have had a history of coronary artery disease (cad), myocardial infarction (mi), non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (niddm), hypertension, dyslipidemia, left hip osteoarthritis and hypothyroidism.The patient¿s surgical history was notable for an open reduction and internal fixation of a fracture of the left acetabulum.Post-operatively at a follow up visit, the patient reported left lower extremity swelling.Evaluation revealed a collapsed and dislocated left hip causing a significant amount of pain and decreased mobility.Further diagnostic testing revealed a lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (dvt) and the patient was admitted to hospital.The indication for the filter placement was reported to be as prophylaxis prior to planned orthopedic surgery.The filter was implanted without complications.The patient is reported to have tolerated the procedure well.Three days later, the patient underwent successful left total hip arthroplasty.More than ten years after the filter implantation, the patient became aware that the filter had tilted.The patient further reported having experienced shortness of breath and anxiety associated with the filter.The product was not returned for analysis.A review of the device history record revealed no anomalies during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported complaint.The trapease vena cava filter is indicated for use in the prevention of recurrent pulmonary embolism (pe) via percutaneous placement in the inferior vena cava (ivc) for patients in which anticoagulants are contraindicated, anticoagulant therapy for thromboembolic disease has failed, emergency treatment following massive pe where anticipated benefits of conventional therapy are reduced or for chronic, recurrent pe where anticoagulant therapy has failed, or is contraindicated.The purpose of a vena cava filter is to catch thrombus from the lower extremities as it travels along normal blood flow patterns up towards the heart.Without images or procedural films for review, the reported filter tilt could not be confirmed and the exact cause could not be determined.Ivc filter tilt has been associated with the anatomy of the vessel, specifically asymmetry and tortuousness.Additionally, the timing and mechanism of the filter tilt is unknown.Due to the nature of the complaint, the reported shortness of breath experienced by the patient could not be confirmed and the exact cause could not be determined.These clinical events do not represent evidence of a device malfunction.Clinical factors that may have influenced these events include the patient¿s pre-existing co-morbidities, pharmacological issues and lesion characteristics.The anxiety experienced by the patient does not represent a device malfunction.Anxiety, part of the body¿s natural response to stress and can cause feelings of, but not limited to, nervousness, mental anguish, fear, unease and worry.Given the limited information available for review, there is nothing to suggest that a malfunction in the design and manufacturing process of the device; therefore, no corrective action will be taken.Should additional information become available, the file will be updated accordingly.
 
Event Description
Per the medical records, the patient was reported to have a history of coronary artery disease (cad), myocardial infarction (mi), type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, left hip osteoarthritis, and hypothyroidism.The surgical history is notable for left acetabulum fracture which required open reduction and internal fixation.In a surgical follow-up visit, the patient presented with swelling of the left lower extremity and was additionally found to have a collapsed and dislocated left hip, which was causing the patient significant amounts of pain and limiting ambulation.An ultrasound revealed lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (dvt).The patient was admitted to the hospital for treatment and placement of an inferior vena cava (ivc) filter and a total hip arthroplasty.The ivc filter was placed without problems or complications.The patient tolerated the procedure well and underwent a successful left total hip arthroplasty three days after the index procedure.There were no reported complications.According to the information received in the patient profile form (ppf), the patient reports tilting of the filter, becoming aware of these events approximately ten years and six months after the filter implantation, and further experienced shortness of breath and anxiety related to the filter.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRAPEASE PVCF FEM/JUG 55CM CSI
Type of Device
FILTER, INTRAVASCULAR, CARDIOVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CORDIS CORPORATION
14201 nw 60th avenue
miami lakes FL 33014 2802
MDR Report Key12211728
MDR Text Key263080106
Report Number1016427-2021-05110
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DTK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K020316
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/01/2021
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/22/2021
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/31/2013
Device Catalogue Number466P306AU
Device Lot Number15226592
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/18/2021
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
UNKNOWN.
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening;
Patient Age80 YR
-
-