|
Complainant part is expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation, but has yet to be received.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.Based on the information available, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.This complaint will be accounted for and monitored via post market surveillance activities.If additional information is made available, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Device report from (b)(6) reports an event as follows: it was reported that during a plif between l3-l5 treating lumbar spinal canal stenosis on (b)(6) 2021, the tip of the driver broke off while a setscrew (unk) was being tightened.The surgeon decided to leave the fragment in the patients body.Procedure was completed with less than thirty (30) minutes delay.This report is for a viper prime comp driver, x25.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H10 additional narrative: d9 h3, h6: a product investigation was conducted.The product was returned to us cq for evaluation.The us cq team conducted a visual inspection of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that viper prime comp driver, x25 the tip of the driver is broken off and the broken fragments were not returned.Thus, confirming the complaint condition but however the embedded condition cannot be confirmed since no x rays were provided.The dimensional inspection was not performed due to post manufacturing damage.The observed condition of viper prime comp driver, x25 in the device was consistent.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The overall complaint was confirmed for viper prime comp driver, x25.While no definitive root cause could be determined, there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the complaint condition and hence the root cause cannot be determined.There was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.H3, h6: a device history record (dhr) review was conducted: a review of the receiving inspection (ri) for viper prime comp driver, x25 was conducted identifying that lot number km853473 was released in a single batch.Batch1: lot qty of (b)(4) units were released on 04 jan 2018 with no discrepancies.As a result, the ri identified no issues during the manufacturing and release of this device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|