H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, applicable previous investigation(s), sample analysis, applicable fmea documents, applicable manufacturing records, and labeling.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint that the needle moved within the deployment system was confirmed, but the exact cause could not be determined from the two photographs were provided for investigation.The photos showed the powerglide attached to the deployment system.One photo showed what appeared to be the catheter over the needle shaft.The device was not in focus.The needle shaft was deflected from the normal path through the distal end of the deployment system.Due to the position of the needle, the deflection from the deployment system most likely occurred after the needle guard was removed; however, the observations of the photos did not point to a specific root cause.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
|