Without the benefit of examination and testing, coloplast is precluded from commenting on the condition of the device or the cause of the occurrence.Should additional facts prompt us to alter or supplement any information or conclusions contained in the original mdr or in any prior supplemental reports, a follow-up report will be submitted.
|
As reported to coloplast, though not verified, the patient with this device experienced continued transverse defect.A small separation at fourchette area was observed.Additionally, it was noted that vaginal mesh exposure, chronic pelvic pain, recurrent stress urinary incontinence proven on urodynamic testing, superficial dyspareunia secondary to her over-corrected perineum, abnormal urinary stream which was also thought to be in part due to the patient's previous sling placement, post void dribbling, and vaginal discharge.Recurrent cystocele, rectocele and enterocele.
|