|
Complaint conclusion: during vascular angiography, a 7mm x 4cm x 90cm saber percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheter wouldn¿t thread onto the unknown wire and it was noted that the end of the balloon had sheared off.There was no reported patient injury.The product was returned for analysis.One non-sterile unit of a saber 7mm x 4cm 90 was received for analysis inside a plastic bag.The mentioned concomitant unknown guidewire involved in the complaint was not returned for evaluation.Per visual analysis of the saber, the tip of the unit was observed separated (not returned for evaluation).No other anomalies found.Functional analysis was performed.A lab sample syringe filled with water was attached to the guidewire lumen of the received catheter and successfully flushed.Neither obstruction nor loosen material/matter was observed during the flushing procedure.Then, an appropriate.018¿ lab sample guide wire was successfully passed through the guidewire lumen.The guide wire freely advanced all through the guidewire lumen of the unit.No anomalies could be found during the functional test.Per microscopic analysis, the unit was observed under the vision system and the tip separation was confirmed.No other anomalies were observed.Per sem analysis, results showed that the outer surface of the distal tip presented elongations near the separated area.This type of damage is commonly caused during the interaction of the unit material with a sharp object or mechanical damage.It is very likely that the same factors that caused the observed elongations on the distal tip outer surface probably led to the separated condition on the distal tip of the unit.No other issues were noted during sem analysis.A product history record (phr) review of lot 82203699 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿guidewire lumen-obstructed¿ was not confirmed since no anomalies were noted during the guidewire insertion withdrawal testing.However, the reported ¿distal tip-separated¿ was confirmed as the tip was received separated.The exact cause cannot be determined.Per sem analysis, the outer surface of the distal tip presented elongations near the separated area.These elongations suggest that the separated area was induced to stretching/pulling events that exceeded the material yield strength prior to the separation.Therefore, procedural and handling factors likely contributed to the reported event.According to the safety information in the instructions for use ¿prior to angioplasty, the catheter should be examined to verify functionality and integrity, and ensure that its size and shape are suitable for the specific procedure for which it is to be used.Do not use if product damage is suspected or evident.If resistance is felt upon removal, then the balloon, guidewire and the sheath should be removed together as a unit, particularly if balloon rupture or leakage is known or suspected.Proper functioning of the catheter depends on its integrity.Care should be used when handling the catheter.Damage may result from kinking, stretching, or forceful wiping of the catheter.Forceful handling can result in catheter separation and the subsequent need to use a snare or other medical interventional techniques to retrieve the pieces.Always verify integrity of the catheter after removal.¿ neither the phr review nor the product analysis suggests that the found damages could be related to the manufacturing process of the unit.Therefore, no corrective or preventive actions will be taken at this time.
|