|
(b)(4).Complainant part is not expected to be returned for manufacturer review/investigation.Without a lot number, the device history records review could not be completed as no product was received.The investigation could not be completed, no product was received; no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.H3, h4, h6: part # 391.906.Synthes lot # 5362660.Supplier lot # a7pa40.Release to warehouse date: 25-oct-2006.Supplier: synthes tuttlingen.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product, and any sub-components, which would contribute to this complaint condition visual inspection: the cable cutter-large (p/n: 391.906, lot #: a7pa40) was returned and received at us customer quality (cq).Upon visual inspection, it was observed that the distal tip of one of the jaws was broken.There were slight scratches and discoloration on the device but has no impact on the functionality of the device.Device failure/defect identified? yes dimensional inspection: complaint relevant dimensions cannot be taken due to the device geometry.Document/ specification review: the following current and manufactured revisions were reviewed: cable cutter, pinch- large no design issues or discrepancies were identified.Complaint confirmed? yes.Investigation conclusion the complaint condition could be confirmed.No definitive root cause can be determined based on the provided information.It is possible that the device encountered unintended forces during its use and discoloration of the device would have been a result of heavy use/high sterilization processes over time, there was no indication that a design or manufacturing issue contributed to the complaint.No design issues were observed during the document/specification review.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|