• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Model Number RBYLP0102
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 07/08/2021
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the profunda femoral artery using ruby coil lps and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, while attempting to advance the ruby coil lp within the introducer sheath, the physician experienced resistance and the ruby coil lp would not advance out of the sheath.Therefore, it was removed.The procedure was completed using non-penumbra coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Event or Problem Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the profunda femoral artery using ruby coil lps and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, while attempting to advance the ruby coil lp within the introducer sheath, the physician experienced resistance and the coil became stuck after advancing a short distance from its initial position within its introducer sheath.Therefore, it was removed.The procedure was completed using non-penumbra coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that the following section was updated for clarification: 1.Section b.Box 5.Describe event or problem evaluation of the returned ruby coil lp revealed that the pusher assembly mid-joint was retracted through the proximal end of the introducer sheath.If this occurs, resistance may be experienced during advancement.Forceful advancement against this resistance likely contributed to the pusher assembly kinks observed near the mid-joint.During functional testing, the ruby coil lp was able to advance slightly from its returned position within the introducer sheath with resistance before strong resistance was experienced, and the ruby coil lp could not advance out of its introducer sheath.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.H3 other text : placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL LP
Common Device Name
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key12242792
Report Number3005168196-2021-01680
Device Sequence Number3612432
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00815948021723
UDI-Public00815948021723
Combination Product (Y/N)Y
Initial Reporter StateAZ
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K192955
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source company representative,health
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 08/24/2021
Report Date (Section F) 01/01/2005
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/29/2025
Device Model NumberRBYLP0102
Device Catalogue NumberRBYLP0102
Device Lot NumberF100684
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/16/2021
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 07/09/2021
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer08/04/2021
Initial Report FDA Received Date07/28/2021
Supplement Report FDA Received Date08/24/2021
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
-
-